Trial reportJAMA2024
Tenecteplase vs Alteplase for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ORIGINAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Multi-centre, Prospective, Randomised, Open Label, Blinded Endpoint (PROBE), Active-controlled Parallel Group Trial to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Chinese Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours After Stroke Onset
Intra-arterial Tenecteplase for Acute Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke: the ANGEL-MeVO-TNK Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the extended time window: an updated meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Methods for Analyzing the Modified Rankin Scale in Stroke Thrombolysis Trials: A Systematic Review and Methodological Framework.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Pooled it
- Safety Outcomes Following Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.CNS drugs · 2026Pooled it
- Tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Intra-arterial thrombolysis agents following endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Chinese stroke association guidelines on reperfusion therapy for acute ischaemic stroke 2024.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2025Guideline
- Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Different Tenecteplase Doses With Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review With Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis to Determine the Optimal Dose.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Intra-arterial thrombolysis as rescue therapy for incomplete reperfusion following thrombectomy: a meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of tenecteplase vs. alteplase in addition to thrombectomy in patients with ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion within 4.5 h: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Tenecteplase versus alteplase in bridging therapy in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different thrombolytic drugs in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Head-to-Head: Recombinant Human Prourokinase Versus Intravenous Thrombolytics in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours - A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Standard-Dose Tenecteplase vs Low-Dose Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke From Large-Vessel Occlusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2026Trial
- Tenecteplase versus standard care in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion: a multi-centre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, phase 3, controlled trial.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2026Trial
- The role of salvianolic acid B and benzoylpaeoniflorin in enhancing angiogenesis through Nrf2/HO-1/VEGFA signaling axis in ischemic stroke recovery.Pharmaceutical biology · 2026Article
- Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke with Intravenous Urokinase (TASK-UK): Protocol for a Multicenter, Prospective, Real-World Study.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage after Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous thrombolytics in acute ischemic stroke: a GRADE-assessed network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Tenecteplase is a bioengineered variant of alteplase with greater fibrin specificity and a longer half-life, allowing single-bolus administration. Evidence on the treatment effect of tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg in Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is limited. Objective: To establish the noninferiority of tenecteplase to alteplase in patients with AIS within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Design, Setting, and Participants: The ORIGINAL study was a multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-group, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, noninferiority trial conducted between July 14, 2021, and July 14, 2023. Participants were recruited from 55 neurology clinics and stroke centers in China and were eligible if they had AIS with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 1 to 25 with measurable neurologic deficit and were symptomatic for at least 30 minutes without significant improvement. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to receive intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) or intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 (no symptoms or no significant disability) at day 90, tested for noninferiority (risk ratio [RR] margin, 0.937). Safety end points included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (per European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III definition) and 90-day all-cause mortality. Results: Among the 1489 patients randomized, 1465 patients were included in the full analysis set (732 in the tenecteplase group; 733 in the alteplase group) and 446 (30.4%) were female. The primary outcome occurred in 72.7% (532/732) of patients receiving tenecteplase and 70.3% (515/733) receiving alteplase (RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.97-1.09]; noninferiority threshold met). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 9 patients (1.2%) in each group (RR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.37-2.70]). The 90-day mortality rate was 4.6% (34/732) in the tenecteplase group and 5.8% (43/736) in the alteplase group (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.51-1.23]). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with AIS eligible for intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours after stroke onset, tenecteplase was noninferior to alteplase with respect to excellent functional outcome (mRS score of 0 or 1) at 90 days and had a similar safety profile. Findings from this study support tenecteplase as a suitable alternative to alteplase in this setting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04915729.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.