Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39266509›Full record

ReviewNature communications2024

The paradox of thermal vs. non-thermal effects in plasmonic photocatalysis.

Rishi Verma, Gunjan Sharma, Vivek Polshettiwar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Quantum-Corrected Plasmonic Effect of AuAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Advanced Bio-Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Future Prospects-A Comprehensive Critical Review.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Chemistry of COChemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hot electron-driven tandem COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Metamaterial-Enhanced Solar-Driven Processes for Energy Conversion and Water Treatment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rishi VermaDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, 400005, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-4460
Gunjan SharmaDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, 400005, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4683-8488
Vivek PolshettiwarDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, 400005, India. vivekpol@tifr.res.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1375-9668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The debate surrounding the roles of thermal and non-thermal pathways in plasmonic catalysis has captured the attention of researchers and sparked vibrant discussions within the scientific community. In this review, we embark on a thorough exploration of this intriguing discourse, starting from fundamental principles and culminating in a detailed understanding of the divergent viewpoints. We probe into the core of the debate by elucidating the behavior of excited charge carriers in illuminated plasmonic nanostructures, which serves as the foundation for the two opposing schools of thought. We present the key arguments and evidence put forth by proponents of both the non-thermal and thermal pathways, providing a perspective on their respective positions. Beyond the theoretical divide, we discussed the evolving methodologies used to unravel these mechanisms. We discuss the use of Arrhenius equations and their variations, shedding light on the ensuing debates about their applicability. Our review emphasizes the significance of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), investigating its role in collective charge oscillations and the decay dynamics that influence catalytic processes. We also talked about the nuances of activation energy, exploring its relationship with the nonlinearity of temperature and light intensity dependence on reaction rates. Additionally, we address the intricacies of catalyst surface temperature measurements and their implications in understanding light-triggered reaction dynamics. The review further discusses wavelength-dependent reaction rates, kinetic isotope effects, and competitive electron transfer reactions, offering an all-inclusive view of the field. This review not only maps the current landscape of plasmonic photocatalysis but also facilitates future explorations and innovations to unlock the full potential of plasmon-mediated catalysis, where synergistic approaches could lead to different vistas in chemical transformations.

Identifiers

PMID39266509
PMCPMC11393361

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.