ArticleBMC health services research2024
A trial of a chat service for patients and their family members in an emergency department.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective communication between patients and healthcare providers in the emergency department (ED) is challenging due to the dynamic nature of the ED environment. This study aimed to trial a chat service enabling patients in the ED and their family members to ask questions freely, exploring the service's feasibility and user experience.
objectivesTo identify the types of needs and inquiries from patients and family members in the ED that could be addressed through the chat service and to assess the user experience of the service.
methodsWe enrolled patients and family members aged over 19 years in the ED, providing the chat service for up to 4 h per ED visit. Trained research nurses followed specific guidelines to respond to messages from the participants. After participation, participants were required to complete a survey. Those who agreed also participated in interviews to provide insights on their experiences with the ED chat service.
resultsA total of 40 participants (20 patients and 20 family members) sent 305 messages (72 by patients and 233 by family members), with patients sending an average of 3.6 messages and family members 11.7. Research nurses resolved 41.4% of patient inquiries and 70.9% of family member inquiries without further healthcare provider involvement. High usability was reported, with positive feedback on communication with healthcare workers, information accessibility, and emotional support.
conclusionsThe ED chat service was found to be feasible and led to positive user experiences for both patients and their family members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.