Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39267452›Full record

ArticlePlant, cell & environment2025

Chitosan stimulates root hair callose deposition, endomembrane dynamics, and inhibits root hair growth.

Matěj Drs, Pavel Krupař, Eliška Škrabálková, Samuel Haluška, Karel Müller, Andrea Potocká, Lucie Brejšková, Natalia Serrano, Aline Voxeur, Samantha Vernhettes and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Matěj DrsInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Pavel KrupařDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Eliška ŠkrabálkováInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Samuel HaluškaInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Karel MüllerInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Andrea PotockáInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Lucie BrejškováInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Natalia SerranoInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Aline VoxeurUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB), Versailles, France.
Samantha VernhettesUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB), Versailles, France.
Jitka OrtmannováInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
George CaldarescuDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-5302
Matyáš FendrychDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Martin PotockýInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3699-7549
Viktor ŽárskýInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Tamara PečenkováInstitute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 6, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4743-2225

Funding

European Research Council 803048Grantová Agentura České Republiky 20-11642SGrantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 287423Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 415322Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy 8J19FR001Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004581Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LM2023050Czech-BioImaging
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although angiosperm plants generally react to immunity elicitors like chitin or chitosan by the cell wall callose deposition, this response in particular cell types, especially upon chitosan treatment, is not fully understood. Here we show that the growing root hairs (RHs) of Arabidopsis can respond to a mild (0.001%) chitosan treatment by the callose deposition and by a deceleration of the RH growth. We demonstrate that the glucan synthase-like 5/PMR4 is vital for chitosan-induced callose deposition but not for RH growth inhibition. Upon the higher chitosan concentration (0.01%) treatment, RHs do not deposit callose, while growth inhibition is prominent. To understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms underpinning the responses to two chitosan treatments, we analysed early Ca

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCell WallChitosanGlucansPlant RootsCalciumCell MembraneGene Expression Regulation, PlantGlucosyltransferasesArabidopsis ProteinsCalciumcalloseChitosanGlucansGlucosyltransferasesarabidopsiscell walldefencegene expressionsignalling

Identifiers

PMID39267452
PMCPMC11615431

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.