ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Human resource allocation status and equity research of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China from 2016 to 2020.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geographical Inequalities in the Distribution of Healthcare Specialists in Poland.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation on the efficiencies of centers for disease control and prevention in China: results from a 12-year national survey.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Regional Disparities and Associated Factors Underlying CDC Health Professional Distribution in China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Equity in the allocation of professional public health human resources and its improvement path in China.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Equity in the allocation of oncology bed resources in China: Longitudinal data from 2008 to 2022.PloS one · 2026Article
- Efficiency and productivity of county-level CDCs in Qingdao municipal, China: a retrospective study based on 6 years of panel data.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Effect of a three-years preventive medicine vocational education program on county-level healthcare workforce development in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to implementation of proper limb positioning in hemiplegic stroke patients: a qualitative study.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2025Article
- Trends and comparative analysis of the burden of migraine in China and globally from 1990 to 2021: an analysis based on the 2021 global burden of disease study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Research on the equity of health manpower resource allocation in the Yangtze River Delta region.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Trends and inequality of human resource in centers for disease control and prevention in China from 2019 to 2023.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the development of global public health has become a matter of great concern and importance for governments worldwide. China, as the largest developing country, plays a crucial role in shaping the development of the public health and its ability to respond to sudden public health emergencies through the fairness of its human resource allocation in center for disease control and prevention (CDC). Objective: This study aims to analyze the situation of health human resource allocation in the China Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDCs), assess the fairness of the allocation, and provide reference for the rational allocation of human resources. Methods: We selected data from the China Health Statistics Yearbook on healthcare technical personnel, other technical personnel, managerial personnel, and workforce technical personnel of China CDCs for the period of 2016-2020. We utilized the Health Resource Density Index to evaluate the level of human resource allocation in China CDCs. Additionally, we used the Gini coefficient and Theil index to assess the fairness of human resource allocation in China CDCs from both a population and geographical perspective. Results: Firstly, the educational qualifications and professional titles of CDC staff have improved, but the workforce is aging. Secondly, HRDI development trends vary among different personnel types and regions with varying levels of economic development. Finally, the results of the Gini coefficient and Theil index indicate that population distribution fairness is better than geographical distribution fairness. Overall, the unfair population distribution is primarily due to regional disparities. Conclusion: The China CDCs should tailor different standards for the allocation of health human resources based on regional characteristics, aiming to enhance the accessibility of health human resources in various regions and achieve equitable allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.