Evidence mapPaperPMID 39267665Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2024

Mengjie Luo, Qi Li, Qingdan Gu, Chunlei Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. IsGut microbes · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengjie LuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, Shenzhen Yantian District People's Hospital Shenzhen 518081, Guangdong, China.
Qi LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, Shenzhen Yantian District People's Hospital Shenzhen 518081, Guangdong, China.
Qingdan GuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, Shenzhen Yantian District People's Hospital Shenzhen 518081, Guangdong, China.
Chunlei ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, Shenzhen Yantian District People's Hospital Shenzhen 518081, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has achieved significant success in treating various cancers, leading to improved therapeutic responses and survival rates among patients. However, in colorectal cancer (CRC), ICB has yielded poor results in tumors that are mismatch repair proficient, microsatellite-stable, or have low levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-L), which account for up to 95% of CRC cases. The underlying mechanisms behind the lack of immune response in MSI-negative CRC to immune checkpoint inhibitors remain an open conundrum. Consequently, there is an urgent need to explore the intrinsic mechanisms and related biomarkers to enhance the intratumoral immune response and render the tumor "immune-reactive". Intestinal microbes, such as the oral microbiome member Fusobacterium nucleatum (

Indexed as

biomarkerscolorectal cancerFusobacterium nucleatumimmune checkpoint blockade therapynano-delivery systems

Identifiers

PMID39267665
PMCPMC11387864

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.