Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39267985›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2024

Magnitude and predictors of elasticity of demand for morphine are similar in male and female rats.

Andrew C Harris, Peter Muelken, Shirelle X Liu, John R Smethells, Mark G LeSage, Jonathan C Gewirtz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew C HarrisHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Peter MuelkenHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Shirelle X LiuHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
John R SmethellsHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Mark G LeSageHennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jonathan C GewirtzDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sex differences in vulnerability to opioid use disorder (OUD) have been reported in some clinical and preclinical studies, but findings are mixed and further research is needed in this area. The goal of this study was to compare elasticity of demand (reinforcement efficacy) in an i.v. morphine self-administration (SA) model in male and female rats using a translationally relevant behavioral economics approach. Rate of acquisition and predictors of individual differences in demand (e.g., cumulative morphine infusions during acquisition) were also evaluated in both sexes. Materials methods and results: Acquisition of morphine SA (0.4 mg/kg/infusion) under a fixed ratio (FR) 1 schedule of reinforcement was slower and infusions earned were lower in females than in males ( Conclusion: Our findings indicate similar elasticity of demand and predictors of individual differences in demand for morphine in male and female rats, although sex differences were observed in initial rate of acquisition and in some correlations between morphine SA measures. These data are consistent with findings of similar OUD vulnerability in males and females in some human and animal studies.

Indexed as

behavioral economicsindividual differencesmorphineopioid use disordersex differences

Identifiers

PMID39267985
PMCPMC11390466

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.