Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39268294›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Literature Overview.

Khalid A Alnemer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Khalid A AlnemerDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) continues to be a predominant cause of global morbidity and mortality, with in-hospital mortality (IHM) serving as a pivotal metric for patient outcomes. This review explores the influence of several clinical variables on IHM in individuals with AMI. Factors such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking habits, existing comorbidities, prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and biomarkers, including high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), significantly affect the prognosis of the patient. Advanced age and comorbid conditions such as diabetes and hypertension exacerbate myocardial damage and systemic impacts, thus increasing IHM. Gender and BMI are also critical, and women and patients with obesity face different risks. Smoking increases both the risk of AMI and IHM, underscoring the importance of cessation interventions. ST-elevation myocardial infarction is associated with elevated IHM and requires immediate reperfusion therapy, while non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction requires customized management for risk assessment. Previous CABG and PCI add complexity to AMI treatment and elevate IHM due to pre-existing coronary pathology and the intricacies of the procedures involved. The application of biomarker-centered techniques facilitates the swift identification of individuals at elevated risk, improves therapeutic planning, and reduces IHM for patients with AMI. Understanding and incorporating these clinical determinants are essential to optimize the management of AMI, minimize IHM, and improve patient outcomes. This all-encompassing strategy requires ongoing research, quality improvement efforts, and personalized care approaches.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionbiomarkersclinical factorsin-hospital mortalitynon-st-elevation myocardial infarctionst-elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID39268294
PMCPMC11390361

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.