Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269193›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2024

Predictors of Change in Vaccination Decisions Among the Vaccine Hesitant: Examining the Roles of Age and Intolerance of Uncertainty.

Julia G Halilova, Samuel Fynes-Clinton, Donna Rose Addis, R Shayna Rosenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia G HalilovaDepartment of Psychology and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4158-5108
Samuel Fynes-ClintonBaycrest Health Sciences, Rotman Research Institute, 3560 Bathurst St, North York, ON M6A 2E1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2694-7617
Donna Rose AddisBaycrest Health Sciences, Rotman Research Institute, 3560 Bathurst St, North York, ON M6A 2E1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6231-1491
R Shayna RosenbaumDepartment of Psychology and Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5328-8675

Funding

Canada 150 Research Chairs ProgramCanadian 2019 Novel Coronavirus 172681CIHRYork Research Chair
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine hesitancy and resistance pose significant threats to controlling pandemics and preventing infectious diseases. In a group of individuals unvaccinated against the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19), we investigated how age, intolerance of uncertainty (IU), and their interaction affected the likelihood of having changed one's vaccination decision a year later. We hypothesized that higher IU would increase the likelihood of becoming vaccinated, particularly among individuals of younger age. We predicted that this effect would remain significant, even after controlling for delay discounting and trust in science. PURPOSE: The goal of this research was to understand the factors influencing changes in vaccination decisions among the vaccine hesitant.

methodsIn a larger longitudinal study, ~7,500 participants from Prolific.co completed demographic and vaccination status questions, a delay discounting task, and the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale in June-August 2021. Approximately 3,200 participants completed a follow-up survey in July-August 2022, answering questions about vaccination status, reasons for vaccination decision, and trust in science. We analyzed data from 251 participants who initially had no intention of getting vaccinated and completed the follow-up survey; 38% reported becoming vaccinated in the intervening year.

resultsData were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression. Over and above other factors related to vaccination decisions (delay discounting, trust in science), younger participants were more likely to change their decision and become vaccinated a year later, especially if they had higher IU, confirming our predictions. Primary reasons for becoming vaccinated were necessity and seeking protection against the virus.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the complex interplay between age, uncertainty, and vaccination decisions, and inform health policies by suggesting the need for tailoring interventions to specific concerns in different age groups.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDecision MakingVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2TrustUncertaintyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Intolerance of uncertaintyPublic health measuresVaccinationVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID39269193
PMCPMC11487580

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.