ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2024
Untangling Zebrafish Genetic Annotation: Addressing Complexities and Nomenclature Issues in Orthologous Evaluation of TCOF1 and NOLC1.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) is a genetic disorder affecting facial development, primarily caused by mutations in the TCOF1 gene. TCOF1, along with NOLC1, play important roles in ribosomal RNA transcription and processing. Previously, a zebrafish model of TCS successfully recapitulated the main characteristics of the syndrome by knocking down the expression of a gene on chromosome 13 (coding for Uniprot ID B8JIY2), which was identified as the TCOF1 orthologue. However, database updates renamed this gene as nolc1 and the zebrafish database (ZFIN) identified a different gene on chromosome 14 as the TCOF1 orthologue (coding for Uniprot ID E7F9D9). NOLC1 and TCOF1 are large proteins with unstructured regions and repetitive sequences that complicate alignments and comparisons. Also, the additional whole genome duplication of teleosts sets further difficulty. In this study, we present evidence that endorses that NOLC1 and TCOF1 are paralogs, and that the zebrafish gene on chromosome 14 is a low-complexity LisH domain-containing factor that displays homology to NOLC1 but lacks essential sequence features to accomplish TCOF1 nucleolar functions. Our analysis also supports the idea that zebrafish, as has been suggested for other non-tetrapod vertebrates, lack the TCOF1 gene that is associated with tripartite nucleolus. Using BLAST searches in a group of teleost genomes, we identified fish-specific sequences similar to E7F9D9 zebrafish protein. We propose naming them "LisH-containing Low Complexity Proteins" (LLCP). Interestingly, the gene on chromosome 13 (nolc1) displays the sequence features, developmental expression patterns, and phenotypic impact of depletion that are characteristic of TCOF1 functions. These findings suggest that in teleost fish, the nucleolar functions described for both NOLC1 and TCOF1 mediated by their repeated motifs, are carried out by a single gene, nolc1. Our study, which is mainly based on computational tools available as free web-based algorithms, could help to solve similar conflicts regarding gene orthology in zebrafish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39269459What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.