ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular germ cell cancer in clinical stage IIA/B-renaissance of an established treatment?]
Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) for the treatment of testicular germ cell tumors-open or robotic? Pro open surgery : RPLND in the management of testis cancer].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe guideline-recommended treatment of choice for clinical stage IIA/B testicular germ cell tumors is chemotherapy with three cycles of PEB/four cycles of PE or, alternatively, radiation for seminomas. Despite their high curative efficacy, both options are associated with significant long-term toxicities. We evaluated the functional and oncological outcomes of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a therapeutic alternative. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween 2018 and 2022, 76 patients (n = 34 seminomas, n = 42 nonseminomas) underwent primary RPLND for marker-negative clinical stage IIA/B testicular germ cell cancer. All patients underwent nerve-sparing RPLND with a unilateral or bilateral template dissection and had a follow-up ≥ 3 months. None of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. In 24 patients, the serum concentration of miR371a-3p was evaluated preoperatively. Follow-up was performed according to EAU guidelines.
resultsMedian age and median follow-up were 30.1 (17-62) years and 29.3 (3-72) months, respectively. Mean operation time, blood loss, and duration of hospitalization were 131 (105-195) min, < 150 ml, and 4.5 (3-9) days, respectively. A Clavien-Dindo IIIa complication was experienced by 8 (10.9%) patients. Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in 90.8%. A mean number of 19 (7-68) lymph nodes were dissected. The mean number of positive lymph nodes was 1.1 (1-5), and the mean diameter of positive lymph nodes was 2.4 (0.8-4.6) cm. Eleven (14.5%) patients had stage pN0 (3/34 seminomas, 8/42 nonseminomas). In 24/27 patients (88.9%) miR371 was positive, and it was negative in 4/4 with pN0 and 3/3 (100%) with teratoma. An outfield relapse was experienced by 7 patients (9.2%), who then received salvage chemotherapy.
conclusionPrimary RPLND for marker-negative clinical stage IIA/B germ cell tumors results in high cure rates without adjuvant chemotherapy and is associated with a low rate of complications if performed in experienced hands. Therefore, primary RPLND should be included in the management of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39269528What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.