Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39269753›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Using AI to Differentiate Mpox From Common Skin Lesions in a Sexual Health Clinic: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Nyi Nyi Soe, Zhen Yu, Phyu Mon Latt, David Lee, Ranjit Singh Samra, Zongyuan Ge, Rashidur Rahman, Jiajun Sun, Jason J Ong, Christopher K Fairley and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nyi Nyi SoeArtificial Intelligence and Modelling in Epidemiology Program, Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-4554-3549
Zhen YuArtificial Intelligence and Modelling in Epidemiology Program, Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5210-2672
Phyu Mon LattArtificial Intelligence and Modelling in Epidemiology Program, Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5880-5731
David LeeMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-5423-4525
Ranjit Singh SamraDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-6754-4255
Zongyuan GeAugmented Intelligence and Multimodal analytics (AIM) for Health Lab, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5880-8673
Rashidur RahmanMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-9902-4066
Jiajun SunArtificial Intelligence and Modelling in Epidemiology Program, Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5529-6660
Jason J OngSchool of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5784-7403
Christopher K FairleySchool of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9081-1664
Lei ZhangArtificial Intelligence and Modelling in Epidemiology Program, Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2343-084X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2022 global outbreak of mpox has significantly impacted health facilities, and necessitated additional infection prevention and control measures and alterations to clinic processes. Early identification of suspected mpox cases will assist in mitigating these impacts.

objectiveWe aimed to develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool to differentiate mpox lesion images from other skin lesions seen in a sexual health clinic.

methodsWe used a data set with 2200 images, that included mpox and non-mpox lesions images, collected from Melbourne Sexual Health Centre and web resources. We adopted deep learning approaches which involved 6 different deep learning architectures to train our AI models. We subsequently evaluated the performance of each model using a hold-out data set and an external validation data set to determine the optimal model for differentiating between mpox and non-mpox lesions.

resultsThe DenseNet-121 model outperformed other models with an overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.928, an accuracy of 0.848, a precision of 0.942, a recall of 0.742, and an F

conclusionsOur study demonstrated it was possible to use an AI-based image recognition algorithm to accurately differentiate between mpox and common skin lesions. Our findings provide a foundation for future investigations aimed at refining the algorithm and establishing the place of such technology in a sexual health clinic.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceMpox, MonkeypoxSkin DiseasesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleSexual HealthSexually Transmitted Diseasesartificial intelligencedeep learningmpoxsexually transmitted infectionsskin lesion

Identifiers

PMID39269753
PMCPMC11437223

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.