ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2024
Semi-supervised machine learning method for predicting homogeneous ancestry groups to assess Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in diverse whole-genome sequencing studies.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- SPLENDID incorporates continuous genetic ancestry in biobank-scale data to improve polygenic risk prediction across diverse populations.Nature methods · 2026Article
- A transparent and generalizable deep-learning framework for genomic ancestry prediction.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Scalable and accurate rare-variant association tests for whole genome sequencing time-to-event analysis in large biobanks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Comparison of variant callers using 60 532 multi-ancestry whole genome sequences.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- GrafAnc: Reliable and reproducible inference of continental and regional population structure.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Evaluating multi-ancestry genome-wide association methods: Statistical power, population structure, and practical implications.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- CNPI: Rapid Analyses of Human Copy Number Data.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Article
- Advances in Whole Genome Sequencing: Methods, Tools, and Applications in Population Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-scale, multi-ethnic whole-genome sequencing (WGS) studies, such as the National Human Genome Research Institute Genome Sequencing Program's Centers for Common Disease Genomics (CCDG), play an important role in increasing diversity for genetic research. Before performing association analyses, assessing Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) is a crucial step in quality control procedures to remove low quality variants and ensure valid downstream analyses. Diverse WGS studies contain ancestrally heterogeneous samples; however, commonly used HWE methods assume that the samples are homogeneous. Therefore, directly applying these to the whole dataset can yield statistically invalid results. To account for this heterogeneity, HWE can be tested on subsets of samples that have genetically homogeneous ancestries and the results aggregated at each variant. To facilitate valid HWE subset testing, we developed a semi-supervised learning approach that predicts homogeneous ancestries based on the genotype. This method provides a convenient tool for estimating HWE in the presence of population structure and missing self-reported race and ethnicities in diverse WGS studies. In addition, assessing HWE within the homogeneous ancestries provides reliable HWE estimates that will directly benefit downstream analyses, including association analyses in WGS studies. We applied our proposed method on the CCDG dataset, predicting homogeneous genetic ancestry groups for 60,545 multi-ethnic WGS samples to assess HWE within each group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.