ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Reconstruction of a robust bacterial replication module.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A double-staining automated flow cytometry method for real-time monitoring of bacteria in continuous bioreactors.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Synthetic rewriting technologies in mammalian cells.Nature communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromosomal DNA replication is a fundamental process of life, involving the assembly of complex machinery and dynamic regulation. In this study, we reconstructed a bacterial replication module (pRC) by artificially clustering 23 genes involved in DNA replication and sequentially deleting these genes from their naturally scattered loci on the chromosome of Escherichia coli. The integration of pRC into the chromosome, moving from positions farther away to close to the replication origin, leads to an enhanced efficiency in DNA synthesis, varying from lower to higher. Strains containing replication modules exhibited increased DNA replication by accelerating the replication fork movement and initiating chromosomal replication earlier in the replication cycle. The minimized module pRC16, containing only replisome and elongation encoding genes, exhibited chromosomal DNA replication efficiency comparable to that of pRC. The replication module demonstrated robust and rapid DNA replication, regardless of growth conditions. Moreover, the replication module is plug-and-play, and integrating it into Mb-sized extrachromosomal plasmids improves their genetic stability. Our findings indicate that DNA replication, being a fundamental life process, can be artificially reconstructed into replication functional modules. This suggests potential applications in DNA replication and the construction of synthetic modular genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.