Evidence mapPaperPMID 39272732Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Free-Running Cardiac and Respiratory Motion-Resolved Imaging: A Paradigm Shift for Managing Motion in Cardiac MRI?

Robert J Holtackers, Matthias Stuber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert J HoltackersDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Rue de Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1809-313X
Matthias StuberDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Rue de Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9843-2028

Funding

Dutch Research Council (NWO) Veni grantMaastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/FHML Starter GrantNiels Stensen FellowshipSwiss National Science Foundation 206021_205413Swiss National Science Foundation 320030_173129Swiss National Science Foundation 320030-227737Swiss National Science Foundation 320030B_201292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used for non-invasive assessment of cardiac morphology, function, and tissue characteristics due to its exquisite soft-tissue contrast. However, it remains time-consuming and requires proficiency, making it costly and limiting its widespread use. Traditional cardiac MRI is inefficient as signal acquisition is often limited to specific cardiac phases and requires complex view planning, parameter adjustments, and management of both respiratory and cardiac motion. Recent efforts have aimed to make cardiac MRI more efficient and accessible. Among these innovations, the free-running framework enables 5D whole-heart imaging without the need for an electrocardiogram signal, respiratory breath-holding, or complex planning. It uses a fully self-gated approach to extract cardiac and respiratory signals directly from the acquired image data, allowing for more efficient coverage in time and space without the need for electrocardiogram gating, triggering, navigators, or breath-holds. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the free-running framework, detailing its history, concepts, recent improvements, and clinical applications.

Indexed as

5Dcardiac MRICMRfree-breathingfree-runningmotion-resolvedself-gating

Identifiers

PMID39272732
PMCPMC11394669

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.