Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39273289›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Based on Simple and Efficient Integrated Preparation Precises Quantitatively for Skin Wound Repair.

Mengjie Qiu, Yating He, Haijie Zhang, Yunquan Zheng, Xianai Shi, Jianmin Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mengjie QiuCollege of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Yating HeCollege of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Haijie ZhangCollege of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Yunquan ZhengCollege of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou 350108, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5571-2898
Xianai ShiFujian Key Laboratory of Medical Instrument and Pharmaceutical Technology, Fuzhou University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou 350108, China.
Jianmin YangFujian Key Laboratory of Medical Instrument and Pharmaceutical Technology, Fuzhou University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou 350108, China.

Funding

Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China No. 2021J01557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has become an important regenerative therapy. However, the preparation method of PRP has not been standardized, and the optimal platelet concentration for PRP used in skin wound repair is unclear, leading to inconsistent clinical efficacy of PRP. Therefore, the development of standardized preparation methods for PRP and the investigation of the dose-response relationship between PRP with different platelet concentrations and tissue regeneration plays an important role in the development and clinical application of PRP technology. This study has developed an integrated blood collection device from blood drawing to centrifugation. Response surface methodology was employed to optimize the preparation conditions, ultimately achieving a platelet recovery rate as high as 95.74% for PRP (with optimal parameters: centrifugation force 1730×

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationPlatelet-Rich PlasmaSkinWound HealingAnimalsBlood PlateletsFibroblastsHumansMaleMicehigh recovery rateoptimal preparation methodplatelet-poor plasmaplatelet-rich plasmaskin restoration

Identifiers

PMID39273289
PMCPMC11394848

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.