Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39273503›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Shell Distribution of Vitamin K3 within Reinforced Electrospun Nanofibers for Improved Photo-Antibacterial Performance.

Wenjian Gong, Meng-Long Wang, Yanan Liu, Deng-Guang Yu, Sim Wan Annie Bligh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Versatility of electrospun Janus wound dressings.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  9. Nanozymes for Accelerating the Foot Wound Healing: A Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Electrospun nanofibers and their application as sensors for healthcare.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. A Soothing Lavender-Scented Electrospun Fibrous Eye Mask.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenjian GongSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.
Meng-Long WangSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9112-4700
Yanan LiuSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.
Deng-Guang YuSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7825-4498
Sim Wan Annie BlighSchool of Health Sciences, Saint Francis University, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4757-2159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personal protective equipment (PPE) has attracted more attention since the outbreak of the epidemic in 2019. Advanced nano techniques, such as electrospinning, can provide new routes for developing novel PPE. However, electrospun antibacterial PPE is not easily obtained. Fibers loaded with photosensitizers prepared using single-fluid electrospinning have a relatively low utilization rate due to the influence of embedding and their inadequate mechanical properties. For this study, monolithic nanofibers and core-shell nanofibers were prepared and compared. Monolithic F1 fibers comprising polyethylene oxide (PEO), poly(vinyl alcohol-co-ethylene) (PVA-co-PE), and the photo-antibacterial agent vitamin K3 (VK3) were created using a single-fluid blending process. Core-shell F2 nanofibers were prepared using coaxial electrospinning, in which the extensible material PEO was set as the core section, and a composite consisting of PEO, PVA-co-PE, and VK3 was set as the shell section. Both F1 and F2 fibers with the designed structural properties had an average diameter of approximately 1.0 μm, as determined using scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. VK3 was amorphously dispersed within the polymeric matrices of F1 and F2 fibers in a compatible manner, as revealed using X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Monolithic F1 fibers had a higher tensile strength of 2.917 ± 0.091 MPa, whereas the core-shell F2 fibers had a longer elongation with a break rate of 194.567 ± 0.091%. Photoreaction tests showed that, with their adjustment, core-shell F2 nanofibers could produce 0.222 μmol/L ·OH upon illumination. F2 fibers had slightly better antibacterial performance than F1 fibers, with inhibition zones of 1.361 ± 0.012 cm and 1.296 ± 0.022 cm for

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsNanofibersVitamin K 3Escherichia coliMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsVitamin K 3coaxial electrospinningcore–shellpersonal protective equipmentphoto-antibacterialvitamin K3

Identifiers

PMID39273503
PMCPMC11394794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.