ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Gender Reassignment and the Role of the Laboratory in Monitoring Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood donor safety and selection criteria for individuals self-identifying as trans or non-binary.Vox sanguinis · 2026Review
- Early Adjuvant Treatment with Semaglutide After Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with Class II-III Obesity: A Prospective Non-Randomized Controlled Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transgender people experience distress due to gender incongruence (i.e., a discrepancy between their gender identity and sex assigned at birth). Gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) is a part of gender reassignment treatment. The therapeutic goals of the treatment are to develop the physical characteristics of the affirmed gender as far as possible. Guidelines have been developed for GAHT, which recommend dosage as well as different formulations of oestrogen and testosterone for treatment. Questions arise about the metabolic side effects of hormone treatment. Establishing reference ranges for common analytes in transgender individuals remains a task for laboratory medicine. It has been suggested once GAHT is commenced, the reference ranges for affirmed gender are reported for red blood cells, haemoglobin and haematocrit. For transgender assigned-female-at-birth (AFAB) people, testosterone concentrations are recommended to be within the reference interval established for cisgender men and for transgender assigned-male-at-birth (AMAB) people, estradiol concentrations are within the reference range for cisgender women. Sex-specific reference ranges are available for certain laboratory tests, and these may be organ (e.g., heart)-specific. Transgender-specific reference ranges may be a requirement for such tests. Laboratories may need to make decisions on how to report other tests in the transgender population, e.g., eGFR. Interpretation of further tests (e.g., reproductive hormones) can be individualized depending on clinical information. Electronic medical record systems require fields for gender identity/biological sex at birth so that laboratory results can be flagged appropriately. In this review, we aim to summarise the current position of the role of the laboratory in the clinical care of the transgender individual. Prior to the review, we will summarise the genetics of sex determination, the aetiology of gender incongruence, and the recommendations for GAHT and monitoring for the transgender population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.