Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275236›Full record

ReviewNutrients2024

Sex-Specific Variation in Metabolic Responses to Diet.

Reya R Andrews, Kayla R Anderson, Jean L Fry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reya R AndrewsDepartment of Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Kayla R AndersonCenter for Muscle Biology, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Jean L FryCenter for Muscle Biology, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3066-0451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suboptimal nutrition is a leading cause of cardiometabolic disease and mortality. Biological sex is a variable that influences individual responses to dietary components and may modulate the impact of diet on metabolic health and disease risk. This review describes findings of studies reporting how biological sex may associate with or affect metabolic outcomes or disease risk in response to varying dietary macronutrient content, Mediterranean diet, Western diet, and medical very low-calorie diet. Although few dietary interventions have been specifically designed to identify sex-diet interactions, future studies improving understanding how sex influences dietary responses could inform precision nutrition interventions for disease prevention and management.

Indexed as

DietDiet, MediterraneanCaloric RestrictionDiet, WesternFemaleHumansMaleSex CharacteristicsSex Factorsbody compositioncardiometabolicdietdietary patternsglucose toleranceinsulinmetabolic healthsex differencesexual dimorphismtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39275236
PMCPMC11397081

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.