Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39275328›Full record

ReviewNutrients2024

Hunger, Satiety, and Their Vulnerabilities.

Richard J Stevenson, Kerri Boutelle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard J StevensonSchool of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2461-5777
Kerri BoutelleDepartment of Pediatrics, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science and Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.

Funding

Targeting food cue responsiveness for weight lossR01DK122504 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOUTELLE, KERRI N · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Australian Research Council DP210101019NIH HHS 1R01DK122504-24A50
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The psychological states of hunger and satiety play an important role in regulating human food intake. Several lines of evidence suggest that these states rely upon declarative learning and memory processes, which are based primarily in the medial temporal lobes (MTL). The MTL, and particularly the hippocampus, is unusual in that it is especially vulnerable to insult. Consequently, we examine here the impact on hunger and satiety of conditions that: (1) are central to ingestive behaviour and where there is evidence of MTL pathology (i.e., habitual consumption of a Western-style diet, obesity, and anorexia nervosa); and (2) where there is overwhelming evidence of MTL pathology, but where ingestive behaviour is not thought central (i.e., temporal lobe epilepsy and post-traumatic stress disorder). While for some of these conditions the evidence base is currently limited, the general conclusion is that MTL impairment is linked, sometimes strongly, to dysfunctional hunger and satiety. This focus on the MTL, and declarative learning and memory processes, has implications for the development of alternative treatment approaches for the regulation of appetite.

Indexed as

HungerSatiationAnorexia NervosaDiet, WesternEatingEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFeeding BehaviorHippocampusHumansLearningMemoryObesityStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticTemporal Lobeappetitedeclarative memoryhungerinteroceptionmedial temporal loberemediationsatietytemporal cues

Identifiers

PMID39275328
PMCPMC11397003

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.