ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
scHyper: reconstructing cell-cell communication through hypergraph neural networks.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- GRAIL-heart: A graph attention network for inferring ligand-receptor interactions in spatial transcriptomics.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Network methods for diagonal integration of unpaired single-cell multiomics data: a review.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted spatial omics-based biomimetic nanoplatform for intelligent and precise intervention in the immunosuppressive core region of ovarian cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Hi-C3: a statistical inference-based model for reconstructing higher-order cell-cell communication networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- CellMsg: graph convolutional networks for ligand-receptor-mediated cell-cell communication analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-cell communications is crucial for the regulation of cellular life and the establishment of cellular relationships. Most approaches of inferring intercellular communications from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data lack a comprehensive global network view of multilayered communications. In this context, we propose scHyper, a new method that can infer intercellular communications from a global network perspective and identify the potential impact of all cells, ligand, and receptor expression on the communication score. scHyper designed a new way to represent tripartite relationships, by extracting a heterogeneous hypergraph that includes the source (ligand expression), the target (receptor expression), and the relevant ligand-receptor (L-R) pairs. scHyper is based on hypergraph representation learning, which measures the degree of match between the intrinsic attributes (static embeddings) of nodes and their observed behaviors (dynamic embeddings) in the context (hyperedges), quantifies the probability of forming hyperedges, and thus reconstructs the cell-cell communication score. Additionally, to effectively mine the key mechanisms of signal transmission, we collect a rich dataset of multisubunit complex L-R pairs and propose a nonparametric test to determine significant intercellular communications. Comparing with other tools indicates that scHyper exhibits superior performance and functionality. Experimental results on the human tumor microenvironment and immune cells demonstrate that scHyper offers reliable and unique capabilities for analyzing intercellular communication networks. Therefore, we introduced an effective strategy that can build high-order interaction patterns, surpassing the limitations of most methods that can only handle low-order interactions, thus more accurately interpreting the complexity of intercellular communications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.