Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39276395›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2024

The development of a capability wellbeing measure in economic evaluation for children and young people aged 11-15.

Samantha Husbands, Paul Mark Mitchell, Philip Kinghorn, Sarah Byford, Katie Breheny, Cara Bailey, Paul Anand, Tim J Peters, Isabella Floredin, Joanna Coast

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Empirical comparison of health-related quality of life and subjective well-being measures in Australian adolescents.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samantha HusbandsHealth Economics & Health Policy (HEHP@Bristol), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.
Paul Mark MitchellHealth Economics & Health Policy (HEHP@Bristol), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.
Philip KinghornHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Sarah ByfordKing's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Katie BrehenyHealth Economics & Health Policy (HEHP@Bristol), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.
Cara BaileySchool of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Paul AnandEconomics, The Open University, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Tim J PetersPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, and Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS1 2LY, UK.
Isabella FloredinHealth Economics & Health Policy (HEHP@Bristol), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.
Joanna CoastHealth Economics & Health Policy (HEHP@Bristol), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK. Electronic address: jo.coast@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 205384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capability approach provides a broad evaluative space for making funding decisions for health and care interventions, with capability wellbeing as the outcome of value. A range of capability measures have been developed for the economic evaluation of health and care interventions for adults. However, such measures have not been previously developed for children and young people for this purpose and may be valuable. This study aimed to identify important capabilities for children and young people aged 11-15, and to develop these into attributes for an economic measure that can inform funding decisions. Thirty-three qualitative in-depth interviews were undertaken with children and young people aged 11-15 (n = 19) and parents (n = 14) in urban and rural areas of England between September 2019 and November 2021. Purposeful maximum variation sampling ensured representation from different backgrounds. Children and young people were asked to think of things important to them and place these on sticky notes around a drawing/photograph of themselves; the interview asked them about these important things. Parents were asked to identify factors that enhanced and negatively impacted their child's quality of life. Analysis using constant comparison facilitated exploration of similarities and differences in important capabilities. A second phase of semi-structured interviews with children and young people (n = 15) explored how these attributes should be expressed in a meaningful way. Eight overarching capability wellbeing themes were identified, with some variation across children and young people, and parent groups: Fun and enjoyment; Learning and experiencing; Attachment; Emotional security andsupport; Achievement; Identity and choice; Physical safety; Aspiration. Potentially, this information will help to provide an alternative approach to the measurement of benefits to children and young people for economic evaluation of health and care interventions, one that will be better able to capture benefits associated with interventions to improve the social determinants of health.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchQuality of LifeAdolescentChildEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleParentsCapability approachChildren and young peopleEconomic evaluationICECAP measuresQualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID39276395
PMCPMC7616779

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.