Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39277458›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2024

Should a single growth standard be used to judge the nutritional status of children under age 5 years globally: Yes.

Elaine Borghi, Harshpal Singh Sachdev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elaine BorghiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: borghie@who.int.
Harshpal Singh SachdevDepartment of Pediatrics and Clinical Epidemiology, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood nutritional status serves as a lens through which nations and communities identify missed opportunities to improve health and wellbeing across the life cycle, as well as economic development and other related sectors. Countries have committed to the global nutrition targets endorsed by the World Health Assembly in 2012, which were included in the Sustainable Development Goals framework under the target to end all forms of malnutrition by 2030. The child malnutrition indicators for tracking countries' progress toward the agreed-upon targets are based on standard definitions of nutritional status against the widely adopted and used World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards. The standards were based on a sample of healthy breastfed infants and young children from diverse ethnic backgrounds and cultural settings as part of the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. The WHO Child Growth Standards developed represent the best description of physiological growth for children aged <5 y. The standards depict normal early childhood growth under optimal environmental conditions and can be used to assess children everywhere, regardless of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and type of feeding.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusWorld Health OrganizationBreast FeedingChild DevelopmentChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild Nutrition DisordersChild, PreschoolFemaleGlobal HealthGrowth ChartsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalechild growthchild healthequityglobal standardsgrowth standards

Identifiers

PMID39277458
PMCPMC11473399

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.