ReviewPediatric research2025
Development and child health in a world of synthetic chemicals.
Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food-Borne Environmental Contaminants, Intestinal Injury, and Early Childhood Stunting: A Developmental Toxicology Perspective.Birth defects research · 2026Review
- A benchmark dataset and interpretable deep learning framework for drug-induced developmental neurotoxicity prediction.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Environmental exposures and pediatric kidney health.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Sex-specific disruption of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) density in the social brain neural network by Firemaster 550.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Characterizing Prenatal Exposure to Contemporary and Emerging Chemicals in a Prospective Cohort of Pregnant Women in Atlanta, Georgia.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Environmental exposures in the neonatal intensive care unit impacting neurodevelopmental outcomes for neonates.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- The promise and challenges of exposomics in child health research.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- PFAS Exposure and Postoperative Weight Regain in Adolescents After Bariatric Surgery: Findings From the Teen-LABS Study.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Observational
- A Hazard-Based Approach Enables the Efficient Identification of Chemicals of Concern in Plastics.Environmental science & technology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemical pollution is one of today's most significant threats to the developmental potential of children worldwide. Maternal exposure to toxicants can perturb sensitive windows of fetal development, indirectly through promoting antenatal disorders, abnormal placental adaptation, or directly through maternal-fetal transport. Current evidence clearly shows that persistent organic chemicals promote hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, placental abnormalities, and fetal growth restriction, whereas findings are less consistent for phthalates and bisphenols. Prospective birth cohorts strongly support a link between adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes and prenatal exposure to flame retardants and organophosphate pesticides. Emerging evidence reveals a potential association between in utero exposure to bisphenols and childhood behavioral disorders, while childhood metabolic health is more consistently associated with postnatal exposure to phthalates and bisphenols. IMPACT: Synthesizes emerging evidence linking modern forms of chemical pollution to antenatal disorders, fetal growth restriction and childhood disorders. Highlights potential developmental impacts of emerging pollutants of concern now ubiquitous in our environment but without regulatory restrictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.