Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39278238›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Of popsicles and crackers: when spatio-temporal memory is not integrated into children's decision-making.

Christine Coughlin, Sabrina Karjack, Jacqueline Pospisil, Joshua K Lee, Simona Ghetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Of popsicles and crackers: when spatio-temporal memory is not integrated into children's decision-making.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Distinct mechanisms and functions of episodic memory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine CoughlinDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Chicago, 1007 West Harrison Street, 1009 BSB , Chicago, IL 60607, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0302-2075
Sabrina KarjackDepartment of Psychology and Center for Mind and Brain, University of California , Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Jacqueline PospisilDepartment of Psychology and Center for Mind and Brain, University of California , Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Joshua K LeeDepartment of Psychology and Center for Mind and Brain, University of California , Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Simona GhettiDepartment of Psychology and Center for Mind and Brain, University of California , Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Funding

James S McDonnell Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior research has used innovative paradigms to show that some non-human animal species demonstrate behavioural choices (i.e. foraging for a food item at a specific location, and at a time that guarantees it has not yet decayed), reflecting episodic-like or 'WWW' memory (memory for 'what' happened, 'where' and 'when'). These results raised the question of whether similar approaches could be used to examine memory in young children in order to reduce verbal demands. The present research examines the extent to which children's WWW memory aligns with memory-based choices in 3- to 5-year-olds (

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultChildChild, PreschoolChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallSpatial Memorycomparative researchdevelopmentepisodic-like memorytemporal cognition

Identifiers

PMID39278238
PMCPMC11449157

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.