Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39279420›Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2024

Predicting the outcome of psychotherapy for chronic depression by person-specific symptom networks.

Lea Schumacher, Jan Philipp Klein, Martin Hautzinger, Martin Härter, Elisabeth Schramm, Levente Kriston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A data re-analysis confirms the value of symptom networks in predicting psychotherapy outcome.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effect of psychotherapy on the multivariate association between insomnia and depressive symptoms in late-life depression.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lea SchumacherDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan Philipp KleinDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Martin HautzingerDepartment of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Martin HärterDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Elisabeth SchrammDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Levente KristonDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychotherapies are efficacious in the treatment of depression, albeit only with a moderate effect size. It is hoped that personalization of treatment can lead to better outcomes. The network theory of psychopathology offers a novel approach suggesting that symptom interactions as displayed in person-specific symptom networks could guide treatment planning for an individual patient. In a sample of 254 patients with chronic depression treated with either disorder-specific or non-specific psychotherapy for 48 weeks, we investigated if person-specific symptom networks predicted observer-rated depression severity at the end of treatment and one and two years after treatment termination. Person-specific symptom networks were constructed based on a time-varying multilevel vector autoregressive model of patient-rated symptom data. We used statistical parameters that describe the structure of these person-specific networks to predict therapy outcome. First, we used symptom centrality measures as predictors. Second, we used a machine learning approach to select parameters that describe the strength of pairwise symptom associations. We found that information on person-specific symptom networks strongly improved the accuracy of the prediction of observer-rated depression severity at treatment termination compared to common covariates recorded at baseline. This was also shown for predicting observer-rated depression severity at one- and two-year follow-up. Pairwise symptom associations were better predictors than symptom centrality parameters for depression severity at the end of therapy and one year later. Replication and external validation of our findings, methodological developments, and work on possible ways of implementation are needed before person-specific networks can be reliably used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, our results indicate that the structure of person-specific symptom networks can provide valuable information for the personalization of treatment for chronic depression.

Indexed as

depressionmachine learningNetwork theoryoutcome predictionpairwise symptom associationspersonalization of treatmentperson‐specific symptom networkspsychotherapysymptom centrality measures

Identifiers

PMID39279420
PMCPMC11403179

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.