ReviewMaterials today. Bio2024
Black phosphorus for bone regeneration: Mechanisms involved and influencing factors.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photocontrolled biomimetic PEEK scaffold with black phosphorus-strontium ion cascade release for vascularized bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Enhancing Bone Repair Process: Application and Perspective on Photothermal Materials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Modular assembly of nanocomposite hydrogel with NIR-responsive black phosphorus release and mild photothermal synergy for enhanced regenerative microenvironment and accelerated infectious bone repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Overexpression of IL-10 in Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promotes Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice.Stem cells international · 2026Article
- Black Phosphorus Nanomaterials and the Senescent Osteoimmune Microenvironment: Mechanisms, Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Outlook.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BP has shown good potential for promoting bone regeneration. However, the understanding of the mechanisms of BP-enhanced bone regeneration is still limited. This review first summarizes the recent advances in applications of BP in bone regeneration. We further highlight the possibility that BP enhances bone regeneration by regulating the behavior of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), osteoblasts, vascular endothelial cells (VECs), and macrophages, mainly through the regulation of cytoskeletal remodeling, energy metabolism, oxidation resistance and surface adsorption properties, etc. In addition, moderating the physicochemical properties of BP (i.e., shape, size, and surface charge) can alter the effects of BP on bone regeneration. This review reveals the underlying mechanisms of BP-enhanced bone regeneration and provides strategies for further material design of BP-based materials for bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.