Evidence mapPaperPMID 39280648Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024

Management considerations and treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed prostate cancer in advanced age patients (≥80 years): real-world data from a single urological center over a 10-year period.

Xiong Xiao, Jun-Xin Wang, Yong Wang, Yong Xu, Ran-Lu Liu, Shan-Qi Guo, Xing-Kang Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiong Xiao *Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6639-0252
Jun-Xin Wang *Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yong WangDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yong XuDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Ran-Lu LiuDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Shan-Qi GuoDepartment of Oncology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-4567
Xing-Kang JiangDepartment of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-1655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is ongoing debate regarding prostate cancer (PCa) screening in advanced age males, leading to treatment decisions often based on tumor staging and life expectancy. A critical gap in clinical evidence and tailored guidelines for the advanced age with PCa persists. This study aims to compare survival outcomes of various treatment approaches in this demographic. Methods: We analyzed data from a large urological center for advanced age patients suspected of having PCa between 2012 and 2022. We collected clinical and pathological characteristics and evaluated treatment modalities, including palliative therapy and definitive therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was implemented to reduce bias between treatment modalities. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Out of 4,333 suspected patients, 376 individuals aged 80 years and older underwent prostate biopsy. The overall detection rate of PCa was 78.7%, with a high prevalence of high-grade tumors [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥2]. Most patients (86.5%) received palliative therapy, while 13.5% underwent definitive therapy. Patients in the definitive therapy group had lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, lower tumor stage, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), longer life expectancy, and a higher Geriatric 8 (G8) score compared to the palliative therapy group. The median OS for the entire cohort was 72.0 months, with 70.0 months for palliative therapy and 96.0 months for definitive therapy. Multivariable analyses identified lymphatic and bone metastasis, as well as definitive therapy, as independent prognostic factors for PFS, CSS, and OS. Conclusions: Advanced age patients, although a small group, have distinct characteristics, including higher PSA levels, positive biopsy rates, and pathological grading and staging. In medically fit elderly patients, especially those with localized PCa and a life expectancy of ≥5 years, definitive therapy could improve survival outcomes.

Indexed as

definitive therapygeriatric populationPalliative therapyprostate cancer (PCa)radical prostatectomy (RP)

Identifiers

PMID39280648
PMCPMC11399059

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.