Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39281129›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Diagnostic value of an interpretable machine learning model based on clinical ultrasound features for follicular thyroid carcinoma.

Yuxin Zheng, Yajiao Zhang, Kefeng Lu, Jiafeng Wang, Linlin Li, Dong Xu, Junping Liu, Jiangyan Lou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuxin ZhengSecond Clinical College, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yajiao ZhangSecond Clinical College, Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Kefeng LuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Jiafeng WangOtolaryngology & Head and Neck Center, Cancer Center, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Linlin LiOtolaryngology & Head and Neck Center, Cancer Center, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Dong XuDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Junping LiuDepartment of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jiangyan LouDepartment of Pediatrics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) present diagnostic challenges due to overlapping clinical and ultrasound features. Improving the diagnosis of FTC can enhance patient prognosis and effectiveness in clinical management. This study seeks to develop a predictive model for FTC based on ultrasound features using machine learning (ML) algorithms and assess its diagnostic effectiveness. Methods: Patients diagnosed with FTA or FTC based on surgical pathology between January 2009 and February 2023 at Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital and Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively included. A total of 562 patients from Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital comprised the training set, and 218 patients from Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital constituted the validation set. Subsequently, clinical parameters and ultrasound characteristics of the patients were collected. The diagnostic parameters were analyzed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariate logistic regression screening methods. Next, a comparative analysis was performed using seven ML models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value (PPV), negative predicted value (NPV), precision, recall, and comprehensive evaluation index (F-score) were calculated to compare the diagnostic efficacy among the seven models and determine the optimal model. Further, the optimal model was validated, and the SHapley Additive ExPlanations (SHAP) approach was applied to explain the significance of the model variables. Finally, an individualized risk assessment was conducted. Results: Age, echogenicity, thyroglobulin antibody (TGAb), echotexture, composition, triiodothyronine (T3), thyroglobulin (TG), margin, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), calcification, and halo thickness >2 mm were influential factors for diagnosing FTC. The XGBoost model was identified as the optimal model after a comprehensive evaluation. The AUC of this model in the validation set was 0.969 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.946-0.992], while its precision sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.791, 0.930, 0.913 and 0.917, respectively. Conclusions: XGBoost model based on ultrasound features was constructed and interpreted using the SHAP method, providing evidence for the diagnosis of FTC and guidance for the personalized treatment of patients.

Indexed as

Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC)machine learning (ML)SHapley Additive ExPlanations (SHAP)ultrasound diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39281129
PMCPMC11400673

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.