ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign and malignant superficial enlarged lymph nodes.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The application of grayscale quantitative analysis in the differential diagnosis of necrosis between cervical lymph node metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and tuberculous lymphadenitis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Lymphatic Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound as a Noninvasive Predictor of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Diagnostic Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Differentiating benign and malignant superficial lymph nodes using super-resolution contrast enhanced ultrasound - a pilot study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In many clinical situations, it is critical to exclude or identify abnormally lymph nodes (LNs). The nature of superficial abnormally LNs is closely related to the stage, treatment, and prognosis of the disease. Ultrasound (US) is an important method for examining superficial LNs due to its cheap and safe characteristics. However, it is still difficult to determine the nature of some LNs with overlapping benign and malignant features in images. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can be used to evaluate the microperfusion status of tissues in real time, and it can improve diagnostic accuracy to a certain extent. Therefore, in this study, we will analyze the correlation between CEUS quantitative parameters and benign and malignant superficial abnormally LNs, to evaluate the efficacy and value of CEUS in distinguishing benign and malignant superficial LNs. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 120 patients of abnormal LNs who underwent US and CEUS at the China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University from December 2020 to August 2023. All 120 cases of abnormal LNs underwent US-guided coarse needle biopsy, and accurate pathological results were obtained, along with complete US and CEUS images. According to the pathological results, LNs were divided into benign and malignant groups, and the qualitative and quantitative parameters of US and CEUS between the two groups were analyzed. The cutoff value is determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the subjects, and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are applied to evaluate the ability of the cutoff value to distinguish between the two groups. Results: There were a total of 120 LNs, including 36 in the benign group and 84 in the malignant group. The results showed that malignant LNs were usually characterized by the disappearance of lymphatic hilum, round ness index (L/T) <2, irregular morphology, and the manifestation of uneven perfusion (P<0.05). The differences in the quantitative parameters peak enhancement (PE), rise time (RT), time to peak (TTP), wash-in rate (WIR), and wash-out rate (WOR) were statistically significant (P<0.05). The result showed that RT and TTP in the malignant LNs were higher than those in the benign LNs, while the PE, WIR, and WOR were lower. A comparison of the ∆ values showed that the differences in ∆PE, ∆WIR, and ∆fall time (FT) were statistically significant (P<0.05), Among them, the ∆PE and ∆WIR of malignant LNs were higher than those of benign LNs, while the ∆FT was lower than that of benign LNs. Conclusions: Quantitative analysis of CEUS features is valuable in the diagnosis of benign and malignant LNs, and US combined with CEUS helps to improve the accuracy of identifying the nature of LNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.