ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2024
Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage and conventional puncture hematoma drainage in the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot assisted stereotactic surgery improves hematoma evacuation in intracerebral hemorrhage compared to frame based method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hydrocephalus in primary brainstem hemorrhage risk predictors and management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical benefit of robot-assisted minimally invasive stereotactic aspiration/drainage in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical effectiveness of conventional puncture hematoma drainage and stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage in managing intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: This is clinical comparative research. One hundred and twenty patients with the intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent puncture hematoma drainage in Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from March 2020 to May 2023 were included and were assigned into the control groups(n=60) and experimental groups(n=60) according to different treatment methods. The experimental group underwent stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage, while the control group underwent conventional puncture hematoma drainage treatment. The duration and situation of surgery, levels of inflammatory factors, as well as preoperative and 1-week postoperative GCS scores and NIHSS scores were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results: In comparison with the control group, the experimental group exhibited considerably less surgical duration(p=0.00), higher amount of intraoperative blood drainage and hematoma clearance rate(p=0.00). The experimental group possessed a substantially more reduced incidence of complications(10%) in comparison with the control group(25%), with a statistically substantial distinction(p=0.03). After therapy, CRP, TNF-a, and IL-6 degrees were considerably more decreased (p=0.00) in the experimental group in comparison with the control group, while GCS grades were considerably more prominent and NIHSS grades were considerably more reduced (p=0.00). Conclusion: Stereotactic robot-guided puncture hematoma drainage is a dependable and safe operative method to treat patients who had intracerebral hemorrhage, resulting in various benefits such as short length of operation, less injury, less inflammatory reaction, high hematoma clear efficiency and satisfactory recovery of neurological function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.