ReviewACS omega2024
Application of Pro-angiogenic Biomaterials in Myocardial Infarction.
Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endogenous and exogenous stimuli-driven intelligent nanocarriers: emerging strategies for the treatment of myocardial infarction.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Doping-Engineered Proangiogenic Nanozymes Orchestrate Ischemic Tissue Regeneration via Cytoprotection and Revascularization.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Protein to biomaterials: Unraveling the antiviral and proangiogenic activities of Ac-TβBioactive materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomaterials have potential applications in the treatment of myocardial infarction (MI). These biomaterials have the ability to mechanically support the ventricular wall and to modulate the inflammatory, metabolic, and local electrophysiological microenvironment. In addition, they can play an equally important role in promoting angiogenesis, which is the primary prerequisite for the treatment of MI. A variety of biomaterials are known to exert pro-angiogenic effects, but the pro-angiogenic mechanisms and functions of different biomaterials are complex and diverse, and have not yet been systematically described. This review will focus on the pro-angiogenesis of biomaterials and systematically describe the mechanisms and functions of different biomaterials in promoting angiogenesis in MI.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.