Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282082›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Using real-world electronic health record data to predict the development of 12 cancer-related symptoms in the context of multimorbidity.

Anindita Bandyopadhyay, Alaa Albashayreh, Nahid Zeinali, Weiguo Fan, Stephanie Gilbertson-White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Non-Invasive Cancer Detection Using Blood Test and Predictive Modeling Approach.Advances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anindita BandyopadhyayDepartment of Business Analytics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-1139
Alaa AlbashayrehCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Nahid ZeinaliDepartment of Informatics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Weiguo FanDepartment of Business Analytics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Stephanie Gilbertson-WhiteCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jon C.D. Houtman · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
Exploratory Center of Excellence for Advancing Multimorbidity Science (CAMS)P20NR018081 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WILLIAMS, JANET K. · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NINR NIH HHS P20 NR018081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study uses electronic health record (EHR) data to predict 12 common cancer symptoms, assessing the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models in identifying symptom influencers. Materials and Methods: We analyzed EHR data of 8156 adults diagnosed with cancer who underwent cancer treatment from 2017 to 2020. Structured and unstructured EHR data were sourced from the Enterprise Data Warehouse for Research at the University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics. Several predictive models, including logistic regression, random forest (RF), and XGBoost, were employed to forecast symptom development. The performances of the models were evaluated by F1-score and area under the curve (AUC) on the testing set. The SHapley Additive exPlanations framework was used to interpret these models and identify the predictive risk factors associated with fatigue as an exemplar. Results: The RF model exhibited superior performance with a macro average AUC of 0.755 and an F1-score of 0.729 in predicting a range of cancer-related symptoms. For instance, the RF model achieved an AUC of 0.954 and an F1-score of 0.914 for pain prediction. Key predictive factors identified included clinical history, cancer characteristics, treatment modalities, and patient demographics depending on the symptom. For example, the odds ratio (OR) for fatigue was significantly influenced by allergy (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.8-2.9) and colitis (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.5-2.4). Discussion: Our research emphasizes the critical integration of multimorbidity and patient characteristics in modeling cancer symptoms, revealing the considerable influence of chronic conditions beyond cancer itself. Conclusion: We highlight the potential of ML for predicting cancer symptoms, suggesting a pathway for integrating such models into clinical systems to enhance personalized care and symptom management.

Indexed as

clinical noteselectronic health recordsmachine learningnatural language processingsymptoms

Identifiers

PMID39282082
PMCPMC11397936

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.