ArticleJAMIA open2024
Using real-world electronic health record data to predict the development of 12 cancer-related symptoms in the context of multimorbidity.
Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Use of Machine Learning for Analyzing Real-World Data in Disease Prediction and Management: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence-Based Strategies for Addressing Cancer- and Treatment-Related Cognitive Impairment: A Review.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Understanding, Recognizing, and Managing Cancer-Related Fatigue Associated with Breast Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- State of the "Art" in Precision Health Symptom Science Research.Seminars in oncology nursing · 2025Review
- Deep Learning Approaches to Forecast Physical and Mental Deterioration During Chemotherapy in Patients with Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Prediction of Symptom Trajectories in Cancer Care: A Deep Learning Approach for Chemotherapy Management.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Cancer Detection Using Blood Test and Predictive Modeling Approach.Advances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This study uses electronic health record (EHR) data to predict 12 common cancer symptoms, assessing the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models in identifying symptom influencers. Materials and Methods: We analyzed EHR data of 8156 adults diagnosed with cancer who underwent cancer treatment from 2017 to 2020. Structured and unstructured EHR data were sourced from the Enterprise Data Warehouse for Research at the University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics. Several predictive models, including logistic regression, random forest (RF), and XGBoost, were employed to forecast symptom development. The performances of the models were evaluated by F1-score and area under the curve (AUC) on the testing set. The SHapley Additive exPlanations framework was used to interpret these models and identify the predictive risk factors associated with fatigue as an exemplar. Results: The RF model exhibited superior performance with a macro average AUC of 0.755 and an F1-score of 0.729 in predicting a range of cancer-related symptoms. For instance, the RF model achieved an AUC of 0.954 and an F1-score of 0.914 for pain prediction. Key predictive factors identified included clinical history, cancer characteristics, treatment modalities, and patient demographics depending on the symptom. For example, the odds ratio (OR) for fatigue was significantly influenced by allergy (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.8-2.9) and colitis (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.5-2.4). Discussion: Our research emphasizes the critical integration of multimorbidity and patient characteristics in modeling cancer symptoms, revealing the considerable influence of chronic conditions beyond cancer itself. Conclusion: We highlight the potential of ML for predicting cancer symptoms, suggesting a pathway for integrating such models into clinical systems to enhance personalized care and symptom management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.