Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39282238›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2024

Using in silico methods to determine optimal tapering regimens for decanoate-based long-acting injectable psychosis drugs.

James R O'Neill, David M Taylor, Mark A Horowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Helping people to discontinue antipsychotics: if, when and how.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James R O'NeillFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-8825
David M TaylorMaudsley Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-1710
Mark A HorowitzDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reducing the dose of psychosis drugs in a gradual hyperbolic manner may minimise withdrawal effects and risk of relapse. There is presently limited guidance on tapering decanoate-based long-acting injectable dopamine antagonists (LIDAs). Objectives: We aimed to apply hyperbolic principles of tapering to the decanoate-based LIDAs flupentixol, zuclopenthixol and haloperidol to develop withdrawal regimens. Design: We used in silico methodology to predict plasma drug levels and D Methods: Existing pharmacokinetic and receptor occupancy data from nuclear neuroimaging studies were used to power modelling. Abrupt discontinuation was examined as a potential strategy, and dose reduction was modelled with pre-defined constraints used in similar work of 10 (fast regimens), 5 (moderate) and 2.5 (slow) percentage points of D Results: Abrupt discontinuation of decanoate-based LIDAs leads to excessive change in D Conclusion: Abrupt cessation of decanoate LIDAs is not consistent with gradual hyperbolic tapering, despite their longer half-lives compared with oral formulations. Reduction to the point of full discontinuation can only be achieved by switching to oral therapy to complete the taper. These results are limited by the in silico and theoretical nature of the study, and there is a need to confirm these findings through real-world observational and interventional studies.

Indexed as

antipsychoticdepotdiscontinuationflupentixolhaloperidolhyperbolicreductionwithdrawalzuclopenthixol

Identifiers

PMID39282238
PMCPMC11401015

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.