ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Calibration of FRET-based biosensors using multiplexed biosensor barcoding.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between fluorescent proteins (FPs) is widely used in the design of genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors, which are powerful tools for monitoring the dynamics of biochemical activities in live cells. FRET ratio, defined as the ratio between acceptor and donor signals, is often used as a proxy for the actual FRET efficiency, which must be corrected for signal crosstalk using donor-only and acceptor-only samples. However, the FRET ratio is highly sensitive to imaging conditions, making direct comparisons across different experiments and over time challenging. Inspired by a method for multiplexed biosensor imaging using barcoded cells, we reasoned that calibration standards with fixed FRET efficiency can be introduced into a subset of cells for normalization of biosensor signals. Our theoretical analysis indicated that the FRET ratio of high-FRET species relative to non-FRET species slightly decreases at high excitation intensity, suggesting the need for calibration using both high and low FRET standards. To test these predictions, we created FRET donor-acceptor pairs locked in "FRET-ON" and "FRET-OFF" conformations and introduced them into a subset of barcoded cells. Our results confirmed the theoretical predictions and showed that the calibrated FRET ratio is independent of imaging settings. We also provided a strategy for calculating the FRET efficiency. Together, our study presents a simple strategy for calibrated and highly multiplexed imaging of FRET biosensors, facilitating reliable comparisons across experiments and supporting long-term imaging applications.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.