ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024
Combined Physics- and Machine-Learning-Based Method to Identify Druggable Binding Sites Using SILCS-Hotspots.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drude SILCS-Nucleic: harnessing explicit electronic polarization in targeting RNA and DNA for drug design.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Computational Modeling of PROTAC Ternary Complexes as Ensembles Using SILCS-xTAC.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Drude SILCS-Nucleic: Harnessing Explicit Electronic Polarization in Targeting RNA and DNA for Drug Design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Solvation Energetic Costs of Cognate Binding Site Formation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- CrypToth: Cryptic Pocket Detection through Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics Simulations-Based Topological Data Analysis.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- CrypTothML: An Integrated Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Machine Learning Approach for Cryptic Site Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying druggable binding sites on proteins is an important and challenging problem, particularly for cryptic, allosteric binding sites that may not be obvious from X-ray, cryo-EM, or predicted structures. The Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) method accounts for the flexibility of the target protein using all-atom molecular simulations that include various small molecule solutes in aqueous solution. During the simulations, the combination of protein flexibility and comprehensive sampling of the water and solute spatial distributions can identify buried binding pockets absent in experimentally determined structures. Previously, we reported a method for leveraging the information in the SILCS sampling to identify binding sites (termed Hotspots) of small mono- or bicyclic compounds, a subset of which coincide with known binding sites of drug-like molecules. Here, we build on that physics-based approach and present a ML model for ranking the Hotspots according to the likelihood they can accommodate drug-like molecules (e.g., molecular weight >200 Da). In the independent validation set, which includes various enzymes and receptors, our model recalls 67% and 89% of experimentally validated ligand binding sites in the top 10 and 20 ranked Hotspots, respectively. Furthermore, we show that the model's output Decision Function is a useful metric to predict binding sites and their potential druggability in new targets. Given the utility the SILCS method for ligand discovery and optimization, the tools presented represent an important advancement in the identification of orthosteric and allosteric binding sites and the discovery of drug-like molecules targeting those sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.