Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39283664›Full record

Observational studyJMIR formative research2024

A Suicide Prevention Digital Technology for Individuals Experiencing an Acute Suicide Crisis in Emergency Departments: Naturalistic Observational Study of Real-World Acceptability, Feasibility, and Safety.

Linda A Dimeff, Kelly Koerner, Kandi Heard, Allison K Ruork, Angela Kelley-Brimer, Suzanne T Witterholt, Mary Beth Lardizabal, Joseph R Clubb, Julie McComish, Arpan Waghray and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Linda A DimeffEvidence-Based Practice Institute, Beaverton, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8582-8709
Kelly KoernerEvidence-Based Practice Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9445-8607
Kandi HeardEvidence-Based Practice Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-0225-7655
Allison K RuorkEvidence-Based Practice Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-6428
Angela Kelley-BrimerEvidence-Based Practice Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3652-9200
Suzanne T WitterholtMental Health and Addiction Clinical Service Line, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7201-4485
Mary Beth LardizabalMental Health and Addiction Clinical Service Line, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-0452-7707
Joseph R ClubbMental Health and Addiction Clinical Service Line, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-3273-4826
Julie McComishProvidence's Well Being Trust, Providence, Renton, WA, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-1208-6488
Arpan WaghrayProvidence's Well Being Trust, Providence, Renton, WA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-4397-6606
Roger DowdyProvidence's Well Being Trust, Providence, Renton, WA, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-0168-2942
Sara Asad-PursleyProvidence's Well Being Trust, Providence, Renton, WA, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-7725-5614
Maria IlacEvidence-Based Practice Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1734-4227
Hannah LawrenceEvidence-Based Practice Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-6909-6840
Frank ZhouEvidence-Based Practice Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-1296-6819
Blair BeadnellEvaluation Specialists, Carlsbad, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6006-5370

Funding

CAMS Relational Agent System (CAMS-RAS) for Suicide PreventionR44MH108222 · NIMH · EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE INSTITUTE, INC. · PI DIMEFF, LINDA A, JOBES, DAVID ALAN · 2018 to 2020
$2.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH108222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency departments (EDs) are the front line in providing suicide care. Expert consensus recommends the delivery of several suicide prevention evidence-based interventions for individuals with acute suicidal ideation in the ED. ED personnel demands and staff shortages compromise delivery and contribute to long wait times and unnecessary hospitalization. Digital technologies can play an important role in helping EDs deliver suicide care without placing further demands on the care team if their use is safe to patients in a routine care context.

objectiveThis study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of an evidence-based digital technology (Jaspr Health) designed for persons with acute suicidal ideation seeking psychiatric crisis ED services when used as part of routine ED-based suicide care. This study deployed Jaspr Health for real-world use in 2 large health care systems in the United States and aimed to evaluate (1) how and whether Jaspr Health could be safely and effectively used outside the context of a researcher-facilitated clinical trial, and (2) that Jaspr's use would be associated with improved patient agitation and distress.

methodsUnder the auspices of a nonsignificant risk device study, ED patients with acute suicidal ideation (N=962) from 2 health care systems representing 10 EDs received access to Jaspr Health as part of their routine suicide care. Primary outcome measures included how many eligible patients were assigned Jaspr Health, which modules were assigned and completed, and finally, the number of adverse events reported by patients or by medical staff. Secondary outcome measures were patient agitation, distress, and satisfaction.

resultsThe most frequent modules assigned were Comfort and Skills (98% of users; n=942) and lethal means assessment (90% of patient users; n=870). Patient task completion rates for all modules ranged from 51% to 79%. No adverse events were reported, suggesting that digital technologies can be safely used for people seeking ED-based psychiatric services. Statistically significant (P<.001) reductions in agitation and distress were reported after using the app. Average patient satisfaction ratings by site were 7.81 (SD 2.22) and 7.10 (SD 2.65), with 88.8% (n=325) and 84% (n=90) of patients recommending the app to others.

conclusionsDigital technologies such as Jaspr Health may be safely and effectively integrated into existing workflows to help deliver evidence-based suicide care in EDs. These findings hold promise for the use of digital technologies in delivering evidence-based care to other vulnerable populations in complex environments.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesSuicide PreventionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSuicidal IdeationUnited Statescaredigital technologyEDemergency departmentEmergency departmentevidence-based interventionhospitalindividualJaspr Healthparticularpsychiatricpsychiatristsafetysuicidesuicide preventionsuicide prevention best practicesvulnerable population

Identifiers

PMID39283664
PMCPMC11443178

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.