ArticleSleep2024
Sleep restriction and age effects on distinct aspects of cognition in adolescents.
Article in Sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of methamphetamine-induced sleep disruption on intradimensional/extradimensional attentional set-shifting in adult rhesus monkeys.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025Article
- Cultural Approaches to Addressing Sleep Deprivation and Improving Sleep Health in Japan: Sleep Issues Among Children and Adolescents Rooted in Self-Sacrifice and Asceticism.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insufficient sleep negatively impacts scholastic performance in children and adolescents. Here we use a dose-response time in bed (TIB) restriction study to evaluate associations between sleep loss and multiple aspects of cognition. We evaluated changes in cognitive measures across ages 10 to 23 years and determined whether the effects of sleep loss changed across this age range. A younger cohort (n = 77, age range 9.9 to 16.2 years) was studied annually for 3 years. An older cohort study (n = 82, age range 15 to 22.8 years) was interrupted by the COVID pandemic with 25 participants completing multiple years. Annually participants completed each of three TIB conditions: four consecutive nights with 7, 8.5, or 10 hours in bed. A day of cognitive testing followed the fourth night. Restricting TIB to 7 hours was associated with impaired top-down attentional control and cognitive flexibility, but performance did not differ between 8.5 and 10 hours of TIB conditions. Psychomotor vigilance test performance decreased as TIB was restricted from 10 to 8.5 hours and decreased further with restriction to 7 hours. Sternberg test measures of working memory were not significantly affected by TIB restriction. The effects of sleep loss on these cognitive measures did not change significantly with age, but age-related improvement in many of the measures may compensate for some sleep loss effects. The findings here do not indicate an adolescent decrease in sleep need; however, the minimal duration of sleep needed for optimal performance appears to differ depending on the cognitive measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.