Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39284948›Full record

ReviewEMBO molecular medicine2024

Whole-sporozoite malaria vaccines: where we are, where we are going.

Diana Moita, Miguel Prudêncio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diana MoitaInstituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisboa, Portugal.
Miguel PrudêncioInstituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisboa, Portugal. mprudencio@medicina.ulisboa.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-1746-6029

Funding

European Commission (EC) 101080744Fundacao para a ciencia e tecnologia SFRH/BD/144817/2019'la Caixa' Foundation ('la Caixa') HR21-848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The malaria vaccination landscape has seen significant advancements with the recent endorsement of RTS,S/AS01 and R21/Matrix-M vaccines, which target the pre-erythrocytic stages of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) infection. However, several challenges remain to be addressed, including the incomplete protection afforded by these vaccines, their dependence on a single Pf antigen, and the fact that they were not designed to protect against P. vivax (Pv) malaria. Injectable formulations of whole-sporozoite (WSpz) malaria vaccines offer a promising alternative to existing subunit vaccines, with recent developments including genetically engineered parasites and optimized administration regimens. Clinical evaluations demonstrate varying efficacy, influenced by factors, such as immune status, prior exposure to malaria, and age. Despite significant progress, a few hurdles persist in vaccine production, deployment, and efficacy in malaria-endemic regions, particularly in children. Concurrently, transgenic parasites expressing Pv antigens emerge as potential solutions for PvWSpz vaccine development. Ongoing clinical studies and advancements in vaccine technology, including the recently described PfSPZ-LARC2 candidate, signify a hopeful future for WSpz malaria vaccines, which hold great promise in the global fight against malaria.

Indexed as

Malaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesPlasmodium falciparumSporozoitesAnimalsHumansPlasmodium vivaxVaccine DevelopmentMalaria VaccinesClinical EvaluationPfSPZPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium vivaxVaccination Regimens

Identifiers

PMID39284948
PMCPMC11473726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.