ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
A comparison between robotic-assisted and open approaches for large ventral hernia repair-a multicenter analysis of 30 days outcomes using the ACHQC database.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of a novel hernia recurrence grading classification system: a surgeon survey using clinical vignettes.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Incisional hernia repair trends in the last decade (2013-2023): an ACHQC analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Association of robotic surgical approach with decreased inpatient opioid exposure after abdominal wall reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Has the reported average hernia size changed in the last year as a result of the change in medicare reimbursement codes?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair - An ACHQC Database 5-Year Analysis.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOver the last few decades, there has been an increase in the use of a minimally invasive (MIS) approach for complex hernias involving component separation. A robotic platform provides better visualization and mobilization of tissues for component separation. We aim to assess the outcomes of open and robotic-assisted approaches for large VHR utilizing the ACHQC national database.
methodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) was performed to include all adult patients who had primary and incisional midline ventral hernias larger than 10 cm and underwent elective open and robotic hernia repairs with mesh from January 2013 to March 2023. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed comparing Open and Robotic approaches.
resultsThe ACHQC database identified 5,516 patients with midline hernias larger than 10 cm who underwent VHR. The open group (OG) had 4,978 patients, and the robotic group (RG) had 538. The RG had a higher median BMI (33.3 kg/m
conclusionA robotic approach improves early 30-day outcomes compared to an open technique for large VHR. There was no difference in SSO at 30 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39285039What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.