ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024
A novel pulmonary fibrosis NOD/SCID murine model with natural aging.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the role of EGR1 and hub senescence-related genes in type II alveolar epithelial cells senescence for obstructive sleep apnea.BMC biotechnology · 2025Article
- Regulatory Roles for SIRT1 in Aging and Immunosenescence.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an age-related disease severely affecting life quality with its prevalence rising as the population ages, yet there is still no effective treatment available. Cell therapy has emerged as a promising option for IPF, however, the absence of mature and stable animal models for IPF immunodeficiency hampers preclinical evaluations of human cell therapies, primarily due to rapid immune clearance of administered cells. This study aims to establish a reliable pulmonary fibrosis (PF) model in immunodeficient mice that supports autologous cell therapy and to investigate underlying mechanism.
methodsWe utilized thirty 5-week-old male NOD/SCID mice, categorizing them into three age groups: 12weeks, 32 weeks and 43 weeks, with 6 mice euthanized randomly from each cohort for lung tissue analysis. We assessed fibrosis using HE staining, Masson's trichrome staining, α-SMA immunohistochemistry and hydroxyproline content measurement. Further, β-galactosidase staining and gene expression analysis of MMP9, TGF-β1, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, SOD1, SOD2, NRF2, SIRT1, and SIRT3 were performed. ELISA was employed to quantify protein levels of TNF-α, TGF-β1, and IL-8.
resultsWhen comparing lung tissues from 32-week-old and 43-week-old mice to those from 12-week-old mice, we noted a marked increase in inflammatory infiltration, fibrosis severity, and hydroxyproline content, alongside elevated expression levels of α-SMA and MMP9. Notably, the degree of fibrosis intensified with age. Additionally, β-galactosidase staining became more pronounced in older mice. Quantitative PCR analyses revealed age-related, increases in the expression of senescence markers (GLB1, P16, P21), and proinflammatory genes (TGF-β1, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8). Conversely, the expression of anti-oxidative stress-related genes (SOD1, SOD2, NRF2, SIRT1, and SIRT3) declined, showing statistically significant differences (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). ELISA results corroborated these findings, indicating a progressive rise in the protein levels of TGF-β1, TNF-α, and IL-8 as the mice aged.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that NOD/SCID mice aged 32 weeks and 43 weeks effectively model pulmonary fibrosis in an elderly context, with the disease pathogenesis likely driven by age-associated inflammation and oxidative stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.