ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2024
Predicting blood transfusion needs in colorectal surgery at a university hospital in Saudi Arabia: insights into anemia, malnutrition, and surgical factors.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction of intraoperative blood transfusion in major surgery: exploiting clinical variables and systemic inflammatory indices.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Saudi Arabia, nearly a quarter of a hospital's blood supply is consumed in operating rooms. However, blood is a scarce resource, and its unavailability has led to the cancellation of many surgeries. This study aims to identify risk factors for perioperative blood transfusion in colorectal surgery, thus providing valuable insights for better blood management and transfusion planning.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent colorectal surgery at King Abdulaziz University Hospital from 2013 to 2022. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical details, and transfusion outcomes were collected and analyzed. Statistical analyses included logistic regression to identify predictors of transfusion and over-transfusion.
resultsWe collected data from 434 patients. Women were almost twice as likely (OR = 1.98; 95%CI = 1.35-2.90) as men to receive one or more units of RBCs. Also more likely to be transfused were patients with a higher ASA score; a lower pre-operative serum hemoglobin (Hgb) level; and malignant disease as the reason for surgery (all p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, receiving a transfusion of packed blood cells (RBCs) was statistically linked to volume of intra-operative blood loss and Hgb level (both p < 0.001); as well as to pre-operative body mass index (BMI), with patients who were under-weight and of normal weight most at risk, and patients with a BMI between 25 and 35 less likely to be transfused. Patients whose pre-operative serum Hgb level was 12 g/dL or higher were more than twice as likely to not receive a transfusion, while those with pre-operative Hgb levels from 8.0 to 9.9 g/dL were three times more likely than not to receive blood, and those with a pre-operative Hgb under 8.0 g/dL almost five times as likely as not.
conclusionsKey risk factors for perioperative blood transfusion in colorectal surgery are preoperative anemia, diabetes, low BMI, and significant blood loss. Addressing these through a multidisciplinary approach and the development of perioperative protocols may reduce transfusion needs. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and refine transfusion risk assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.