ArticleESC heart failure2025
Frailty in heart failure according to the presence or absence of wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Frailty status, clinical and functional outcomes in cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Temporal therapeutic mismatch in frail older adults with heart Failure: A framework for Frailty-Informed prescribing.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Review
- Heart Failure in the Modern Era: A Narrative Overview of Recent Research from 2022-2025.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Functional Capacity Evaluation and Rehabilitation Strategies in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Frailty in heart failure according to the presence or absence of wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTRwt CA) is a common, underdiagnosed cause of heart failure (HF) in the elderly. Concurrent extracardiac amyloid infiltration might be responsible for a specific frailty phenotype. This study aims to compare the prevalence and characteristics of frailty parameters in HF patients, with or without ATTRwt CA.
methodsIn a comparative cross-sectional study, we prospectively included consecutive HF patients with or without ATTRwt CA (the HF + ATTRwt+ and HF + ATTRwt- groups, respectively) between April 2018 and April 2021. Logistic regression models were used to compare the groups with regard to frailty as assessed using multidimensional geriatric tools.
resultsWe included 123 patients (68 HF + ATTRwt+ and 55 HF + ATTRwt-). The mean age was 80.9 (standard deviation 6.3) years, 87% were male, 34% had left ventricular systolic dysfunction and 34% were New York Heart Association (NYHA) III. Relative to the HF + ATTRwt- group, patients in the HF + ATTRwt+ group were more likely to have shrinking [odds ratios = 2.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.7), P = 0.03], balance disorders [1.8 (1.1 to 2.8), P = 0.02], memory complaints [2.5, (1.0 to 5.9), P = 0.05] and overactive bladder [1.5 (1.1 to 2.2), P = 0.03], independently of age, sex, NYHA class and diabetes status. The proportion of very frail patients was higher (albeit not significantly) in the HF + ATTRwt+ group than in the HF + ATTRwt- group [2.4 (0.9 to 6.9), P = 0.10].
conclusionsATTRwt CA is associated with a specific frailty phenotype. Patients with ATTRwt CA should be screened for frailty and managed collaboratively by cardiologists and geriatricians, with a view to improving quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.