Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286167›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

The arsenic bioremediation using genetically engineered microbial strains on aquatic environments: An updated overview.

Mohammed A E Naiel, Ehab S Taher, Fatema Rashed, Shakira Ghazanfar, Abdelrazeq M Shehata, Nourelhuda A Mohammed, Raul Pascalau, Laura Smuleac, Ateya Megahed Ibrahim, Ahmed Abdeen and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohammed A E NaielAnimal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt.
Ehab S TaherDepartment of Basic Medical and Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Zarqa University, Zarqa, 13110, Jordan.
Fatema RashedDepartment of Basic Medical and Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Zarqa University, Zarqa, 13110, Jordan.
Shakira GhazanfarNational Institute for Genomics Advanced Biotechnology, National Agricultural Research Centre, Park Road, Islamabad, 45500, Pakistan.
Abdelrazeq M ShehataDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nourelhuda A MohammedDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Mutah, 61710, Al-Karak, Jordan.
Raul PascalauDepartment of Agricultural Technologies, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timisoara, Romania.
Laura SmuleacDepartment of Sustainable Development and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Agriculture, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timisoara, Timisoara, Roman, Romania.
Ateya Megahed IbrahimDepartment of Administration and Nursing Education, College of Nursing, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AbdeenDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Toukh, 13736, Egypt.
Mustafa ShukryDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, 33516, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination threatens the aquatic environment and human health. Different physical and chemical procedures have been adopted in many regions; however, their adoption is usually limited since they take longer time, are more expensive, and are ineffective in polluted areas with high heavy metal contents. Thus, biological remediation is considered a suitable applicable method for treating contaminates due to its aquatic-friendly features. Bacteria possess an active metabolism that enables them to thrive and develop in highly contaminated water bodies with arsenic (As). They achieve this by utilizing their genetic structure to selectively target As and deactivate its toxic influences. Therefore, this review extensively inspects the bacterial reactions and interactions with As. In addition, this literature demonstrated the potential of certain genetically engineered bacterial strains to upregulate the expression and activity of specific genes associated with As detoxification. The As resistant mechanisms in bacteria exhibit significant variation depending on the genetics and type of the bacterium, which is strongly affected by the physical water criteria of their surrounding aquatic environment. Moreover, this literature has attempted to establish scientific connections between existing knowledge and suggested sustainable methods for removing As from aquatic bodies by utilizing genetically engineered bacterial strains. We shall outline the primary techniques employed by bacteria to bioremediate As from aquatic environments. Additionally, we will define the primary obstacles that face the wide application of genetically modified bacterial strains for As bioremediation in open water bodies. This review can serve as a target for future studies aiming to implement real-time bioremediation techniques. In addition, potential synergies between the bioremediation technology and other techniques are suggested, which can be employed for As bioremediation.

Indexed as

ArsenicBioremediationBiotechnologyContaminant removalGenome

Identifiers

PMID39286167
PMCPMC11402758

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.