Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286611›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Robotic-assisted Lymphovenous Anastomosis of the Central Lymphatic System.

Lisanne Grünherz, Andrea Weinzierl, Christian Alexander Gutschow, Gilbert Dominique Puippe, Ralph Gnannt, Donata von Reibnitz, Epameinondas Gousopoulos, Carlotta Barbon, Pietro Giovanoli, Claus Christian Pieper and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Advancing Robotic-assisted Microsurgery for Access to Deep Anatomical Structures.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisanne GrünherzFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrea WeinzierlFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian Alexander GutschowDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Gilbert Dominique PuippeInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ralph GnanntInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Donata von ReibnitzFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Epameinondas GousopoulosFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carlotta BarbonFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pietro GiovanoliFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Claus Christian PieperDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nicole LindenblattFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent advances in robotic microsurgery have enabled the application of robotic technology in central lymphatic reconstruction. Although the use of microsurgical robots demands careful consideration of associated costs and potentially prolonged operating times, it may offer improved surgical approaches and enhanced accessibility to deeper anatomical structures such as the thoracic duct (TD). Methods: We report on successful reconstruction of the central lymphatic system using the Symani Surgical System in four patients with lesions of the central lymphatic system. The patients were of different age (range: 8 mo-60 y) and had variable conditions, including central conducting lymphatic anomaly and other rare anomalies of the central lymphatic pathways. Results: Depending on the underlying pathology, a cervical access (n = 1) or median laparotomy (n = 3) was chosen to access the TD and perform anastomosis with a nearby vein. In all patients, anastomoses were patent, and chyle leakage decreased postoperatively. From a surgical perspective, the Symani Surgical System improved the precision of the microsurgeon and accessibility to the deep-lying TD. Conclusion: Considering the high morbidity and rarity of pathologies of the central lymphatic system, robotic-assisted microsurgery holds substantial promise in expanding and improving the microsurgical treatment for central lymphatic anomalies.

Identifiers

PMID39286611
PMCPMC11404956

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.