Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39286739›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2024

Physical therapy registries worldwide: A systematic review.

Alireza Banaye Yazdipour, Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh, Salman Nazary-Moghadam, Goli Arji, Fatemeh Sadat Mirmohammad Meigooni, Khalil Kimiafar, Leila Shahmoradi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interventions in functional epiphora-a systematic review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alireza Banaye YazdipourDepartment of Health Information Management and Medical Informatics, School of Allied Medical Sciences Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-2640
Seyed Mohammad AyyoubzadehDepartment of Health Information Management and Medical Informatics, School of Allied Medical Sciences Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8450-7818
Salman Nazary-MoghadamDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Goli ArjiDepartment of Health Information Management, School of Nursing and Midwifery Saveh University of Medical Sciences Saveh Markazi Iran.
Fatemeh Sadat Mirmohammad MeigooniDepartment of Information Technology Management University of Tehran Tehran Iran.
Khalil KimiafarDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0351-4675
Leila ShahmoradiDepartment of Health Information Management and Medical Informatics, School of Allied Medical Sciences Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays, the demand for physical therapy services has grown significantly over the last few decades due to an aging population, a rise in chronic conditions, and increased awareness of the benefits of physical therapy for injury recovery and managing various health issues. Collecting and managing data from physical therapy services is highly significant and beneficial. One of the information management systems that facilitates data collection related to physical therapy services is a physical therapy registry. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify physical therapy registries worldwide and examine the characteristics and data elements of each registry. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE databases were searched from inception until March 19, 2023 by using keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms regarding "registries" and "physical therapy." The criteria for inclusion in the study were: (1) studies with the English language; (2) original studies, and online access to the physical therapy registry is available; (3) full-text available; (4) studies related to the aims of the study, and (5) studies that have sufficient available information regarding the minimum datasets and other characteristics physical therapy registry. The methodological quality of the included studies was independently assessed by two reviewers using the Effective Public Health Practice Project's (EPHPP) quality assessment tool. Results: Sixteen studies were eligible to be included. The findings of this review indicated that the oldest physical therapy registry was established in 1992, while the newest one was established in 2017. The USA has the highest number of physical therapy registries ( Conclusion: This systematic review found that most developed countries have implemented web-based physical therapy registries to collect administrative and clinical data at the national level. It is recommended that developing countries design and implement similar registries based on these characteristics and extracted data elements. Additionally, these registries should be designed to enable data sharing and interoperability with other international health information systems.

Indexed as

minimum data setmusculoskeletal diseasephysical therapyregistry

Identifiers

PMID39286739
PMCPMC11403353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.