ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
A high-dimensional omnibus test for set-based association analysis.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Set-based association analysis is a valuable tool in studying the etiology of complex diseases in genome-wide association studies, as it allows for the joint testing of variants in a region or group. Two common types of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-disease functional models are recognized when evaluating the joint function of a set of SNP: the cumulative weak signal model, in which multiple functional variants with small effects contribute to disease risk, and the dominating strong signal model, in which a few functional variants with large effects contribute to disease risk. However, existing methods have two main limitations that reduce their power. Firstly, they typically only consider one disease-SNP association model, which can result in significant power loss if the model is misspecified. Secondly, they do not account for the high-dimensional nature of SNPs, leading to low power or high false positives. In this study, we propose a solution to these challenges by using a high-dimensional inference procedure that involves simultaneously fitting many SNPs in a regression model. We also propose an omnibus testing procedure that employs a robust and powerful P-value combination method to enhance the power of SNP-set association. Our results from extensive simulation studies and a real data analysis demonstrate that our set-based high-dimensional inference strategy is both flexible and computationally efficient and can substantially improve the power of SNP-set association analysis. Application to a real dataset further demonstrates the utility of the testing strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.