Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39288231›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

A high-dimensional omnibus test for set-based association analysis.

Haitao Yang, Xin Wang, Zechen Zhang, Fuzhao Chen, Hongyan Cao, Lina Yan, Xia Gao, Hui Dong, Yuehua Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haitao YangDivision of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050017, P.R. China.
Xin WangDivision of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050017, P.R. China.
Zechen ZhangDivision of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050017, P.R. China.
Fuzhao ChenDivision of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050017, P.R. China.
Hongyan CaoDepartment of Health Statistics, Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Diseases Risk Assessment, School of Public Health; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, No 56 Xinjian South Rd., Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-0315-7156
Lina YanDivision of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050017, P.R. China.
Xia GaoDivision of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050017, P.R. China.
Hui DongDepartment of Neurology, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 215 West Heping Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China.
Yuehua CuiDepartment of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, 619 Red Cedar Rd., East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-1753

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
GWA Mapping: Maternal Metabolism-Birth Weight InteractionsU01HG004415 · NHGRI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LOWE, WILLIAM L · 2007 to 2009
$1.1M
CIHREducation Department of Hebei ProvinceEducation Department of Hebei Province ZD2022143National Natural Science Foundation of China 81872717Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province H2019206558NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004415NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904opening foundation of Hebei Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine JYFY-23ZR013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Set-based association analysis is a valuable tool in studying the etiology of complex diseases in genome-wide association studies, as it allows for the joint testing of variants in a region or group. Two common types of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-disease functional models are recognized when evaluating the joint function of a set of SNP: the cumulative weak signal model, in which multiple functional variants with small effects contribute to disease risk, and the dominating strong signal model, in which a few functional variants with large effects contribute to disease risk. However, existing methods have two main limitations that reduce their power. Firstly, they typically only consider one disease-SNP association model, which can result in significant power loss if the model is misspecified. Secondly, they do not account for the high-dimensional nature of SNPs, leading to low power or high false positives. In this study, we propose a solution to these challenges by using a high-dimensional inference procedure that involves simultaneously fitting many SNPs in a regression model. We also propose an omnibus testing procedure that employs a robust and powerful P-value combination method to enhance the power of SNP-set association. Our results from extensive simulation studies and a real data analysis demonstrate that our set-based high-dimensional inference strategy is both flexible and computationally efficient and can substantially improve the power of SNP-set association analysis. Application to a real dataset further demonstrates the utility of the testing strategy.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsComputer SimulationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansModels, Genetichigh-dimensional inferenceomnibus testP-value combinationSNP–set associationvariable screening

Identifiers

PMID39288231
PMCPMC11407446

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.