Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39288258›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2024

Benzenoid Aromatics from Renewable Resources.

Shasha Zheng, Zhenlei Zhang, Songbo He, Huaizhou Yang, Hanan Atia, Ali M Abdel-Mageed, Sebastian Wohlrab, Eszter Baráth, Sergey Tin, Hero J Heeres and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shasha ZhengLeibniz Institut für Katalyse e.V., Albert-Einstein-Strasse 29a, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3287-6739
Zhenlei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, College of Chemical Engineering and Environment, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 102249 Beijing, China.
Songbo HeJoint International Research Laboratory of Circular Carbon, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-5001-6620
Huaizhou YangGreen Chemical Reaction Engineering, Engineering and Technology Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7489-0948
Hanan AtiaLeibniz Institut für Katalyse e.V., Albert-Einstein-Strasse 29a, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Ali M Abdel-MageedLeibniz Institut für Katalyse e.V., Albert-Einstein-Strasse 29a, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4160-0611
Sebastian WohlrabLeibniz Institut für Katalyse e.V., Albert-Einstein-Strasse 29a, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1407-7263
Eszter BaráthLeibniz Institut für Katalyse e.V., Albert-Einstein-Strasse 29a, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8494-3388
Sergey TinLeibniz Institut für Katalyse e.V., Albert-Einstein-Strasse 29a, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Hero J HeeresGreen Chemical Reaction Engineering, Engineering and Technology Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1249-543X
Peter J DeussGreen Chemical Reaction Engineering, Engineering and Technology Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2254-2500
Johannes G de VriesLeibniz Institut für Katalyse e.V., Albert-Einstein-Strasse 29a, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5245-7748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this Review, all known chemical methods for the conversion of renewable resources into benzenoid aromatics are summarized. The raw materials that were taken into consideration are CO

Identifiers

PMID39288258
PMCPMC11467972

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.