ReviewRespiratory care2024
Ventilation and Oxygenation During and After Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Changing Paradigms.
Review in Respiratory care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07088120 (PRecision-Controlled Ventilation to Enhance Cardiac Arrest Intervention and Survival IN CPR), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PRecision-Controlled Ventilation to Enhance Cardiac Arrest Intervention and Survival IN CPR: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of different airway pressures in (synchronized) ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of gasp frequency combined with echocardiography for assessing cardiac arrest and myocardial function during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in rats.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of ventilatory parameters reporting in large animal models of cardiac arrest: a scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac arrest (CA) remains a major cause of death despite advancements in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), post-resuscitation care, and international efforts to develop evidence-based guidelines. Effectively managing ventilation and oxygenation during and after CPR is vital for patient survival and neurological outcomes, yet it remains a challenging task. This review examines current strategies for ventilation and oxygenation during and after CPR, focusing on evidence-based guidelines, the balance between ventilation effectiveness and risks, and proposed methods for monitoring ventilation quality. It emphasizes the need to provide adequate ventilation and oxygenation during and after CPR while avoiding hyperventilation and hypoventilation, which can negatively impact resuscitation and post-CA outcomes. The review also explores mechanical ventilation as an alternative to manual methods and the use of feedback devices. The impact of post-CA ventilation and oxygenation on patient outcomes and recommended management strategies are discussed. Finally, the review highlights current gaps in the literature and the need for more well-designed large clinical studies, such as the impact of different ventilation variables (tidal volume and breathing frequency) on the return of spontaneous circulation and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.