Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290660›Full record

ReviewGut microbiome (Cambridge, England)2024

The impact of faecal diversion on the gut microbiome: a systematic review.

Shien Wenn Sam, Bilal Hafeez, Hwa Ian Ong, Sonia Gill, Olivia Smibert, Aonghus Lavelle, Adele Burgess, David Proud, Helen Mohan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07674186 (Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Via the Diverting Stoma Ameliorates Diversion Colitis in Patients With Temporary Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07674186 nacompletednot on this map

Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Via the Diverting Stoma Ameliorates Diversion Colitis in Patients With Temporary Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Endoscopic and Histopathological Assessment

TypeinterventionalSponsorYongjian LiaoRan2022 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsDiversion ColitisArmsAutologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (auto-FMT), saline irrigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shien Wenn SamFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Bilal HafeezFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7037-1075
Hwa Ian OngFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-9863
Sonia GillFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Olivia SmibertFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Aonghus LavelleDepartment of Anatomy & Neuroscience and APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Adele BurgessFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
David ProudFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Helen MohanFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversion of the faecal stream is associated with diversion colitis (DC). Preliminary studies indicate that microbiome dysbiosis contributes to its development and potentially treatment. This review aims to characterise these changes in the context of faecal diversion and identify their clinical impact. A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases using a predefined search strategy identifying studies investigating changes in microbiome following diversion. Findings reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Of 743 results, 6 met inclusion criteria. Five reported significantly decreased microbiome diversity in the diverted colon. At phylum level, decreases in Bacillota with a concomitant increase in Pseudomonadota were observed, consistent with dysbiosis. At genus level, studies reported decreases in beneficial lactic acid bacteria which produce short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), which inversely correlated with disease severity. Significant losses in commensals were also noted. These changes were seen to be partially reversible with restoration of bowel continuity. Changes within the microbiome were reflected by histopathological findings suggestive of intestinal dysfunction. Faecal diversion is associated with dysbiosis in the diverted colon which may have clinical implications. This is reflected in loss of microbiome diversity, increases in potentially pathogenic-associated phyla and reduction in SCFA-producing and commensal bacteria.

Indexed as

colostomydiversiondysbiosisileostomymicrobiomemicrobiotastoma

Identifiers

PMID39290660
PMCPMC11406410

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.