ReviewGut microbiome (Cambridge, England)2024
The impact of faecal diversion on the gut microbiome: a systematic review.
Review in Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07674186 (Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Via the Diverting Stoma Ameliorates Diversion Colitis in Patients With Temporary Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Via the Diverting Stoma Ameliorates Diversion Colitis in Patients With Temporary Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Endoscopic and Histopathological Assessment
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed Loop Ileostomy Reversal Increases the Risk of Colitis and Clostridium difficile Infection.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Changes in Gut Microbiome According to Probiotic Intake in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Diverting Stoma Repair: Study Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Association of Gut Dysbiosis with Disease Phenotype and Treatment in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Independent risk factors for diversion colitis: a retrospective case-control study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diversion of the faecal stream is associated with diversion colitis (DC). Preliminary studies indicate that microbiome dysbiosis contributes to its development and potentially treatment. This review aims to characterise these changes in the context of faecal diversion and identify their clinical impact. A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases using a predefined search strategy identifying studies investigating changes in microbiome following diversion. Findings reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Of 743 results, 6 met inclusion criteria. Five reported significantly decreased microbiome diversity in the diverted colon. At phylum level, decreases in Bacillota with a concomitant increase in Pseudomonadota were observed, consistent with dysbiosis. At genus level, studies reported decreases in beneficial lactic acid bacteria which produce short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), which inversely correlated with disease severity. Significant losses in commensals were also noted. These changes were seen to be partially reversible with restoration of bowel continuity. Changes within the microbiome were reflected by histopathological findings suggestive of intestinal dysfunction. Faecal diversion is associated with dysbiosis in the diverted colon which may have clinical implications. This is reflected in loss of microbiome diversity, increases in potentially pathogenic-associated phyla and reduction in SCFA-producing and commensal bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.